Current management and risk of recurrent stroke in cerebrovascular patients with right-to-left cardiac shunt.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Right-to-left cardiac shunt (RLS) is considered a risk factor for stroke, especially in patients aged <55 years. We aimed to investigate the current management and prognosis in consecutive patients with RLS and otherwise cryptogenic cerebrovascular events.
METHODS
In total, 1,126 patients with cryptogenic stroke or TIA were included from 17 German neurology departments. During a mean follow-up of 28.4 months, we assessed current antithrombotic medication, percutaneous device closure (PDC) and recurrent cerebrovascular events in 899 patients (79.8%). Stroke recurrence was compared between 548 patients without RLS and 351 patients with RLS under various prevention regimens.
RESULTS
RLS was detected in 35.9% of cryptogenic cerebrovascular patients, but could not be evaluated as an independent predictor for recurrent stroke (adjusted HR 1.6, 95% CI: 0.9-2.7). In RLS-positive patients, the Kaplan-Meier estimate for stroke during the first year was 4.1% (95% CI: 1.9-6.3%) and 1.7% (95% CI: 0.9-2.4%) per year thereafter. At the last follow-up before recurrent stroke or end of study, 117 RLS-positive patients (33.3%) had received a PDC, 154 (43.9%) were receiving antiplatelets, 63 (17.9%) received anticoagulation, and 17 (4.8%) received none of the above. No association with recurrent stroke was found for the secondary preventive regime.
CONCLUSION
Our multicenter hospital-based cohort study confirmed low recurrent event rates in RLS patients with otherwise cryptogenic stroke or TIA, as well as a great heterogeneity of current management. Despite the lack of scientific evidence, a substantial number of RLS-positive patients underwent PDC for secondary stroke prevention.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.