JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2009
Baseline fractional flow reserve and stent diameter predict optimal post-stent fractional flow reserve and major adverse cardiac events after bare-metal stent deployment.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Samady Habib, McDaniel Michael, Veledar Emir, De Bruyne Bernard, Pijls Nico H, Fearon William F, Vaccarino Viola
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify baseline clinical, angiographic, and hemodynamic variables associated with optimal bare-metal stent (BMS) deployment, allowing selection of patients for treatment with BMS.
BACKGROUND: Patients with fractional flow reserve (FFR) >0.90 after BMS have low (<6%) major adverse cardiac event rates (MACE). We hypothesized that baseline variables can predict post-stent FFR >0.90 and MACE after BMS.
METHODS: In 586 patients from the multicenter post-BMS FFR registry, we developed multivariable logistic regression models to identify clinical, angiographic, and hemodynamic variables associated with post-stent FFR >or=0.90 and 6-month MACE.
RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounders, baseline FFR (odds ratio [OR]: 5.0) and stent diameter (OR: 2.5 per millimeter) were predictive of post-stent FFR >0.90. Lower FFR (OR: 7.8); smaller stent diameter (OR: 3.7 per millimeter); longer stent length (OR: 1.0 per millimeter); and larger minimal luminal diameter (OR: 2.2 per millimeter) were predictors of MACE. In patients receiving 3-mm diameter stents, baseline FFR >0.70 yielded significantly higher likelihood of achieving post-stent FFR >0.90 than baseline FFR <or=0.70 (77% vs. 63%, p < 0.05); and in patients receiving <3-mm diameter stents, baseline FFR <0.50 was associated with higher MACE than FFR 0.50 to 0.70, and FFR >0.70 (40% vs. 15% vs. 13%, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving BMS, baseline FFR and stent diameter are predictors of post-stent FFR >0.90; and baseline FFR, stent diameter, stent length, and minimal luminal diameter are predictors of MACE. These variables may allow selection of patients who will have excellent results with BMS.
BACKGROUND: Patients with fractional flow reserve (FFR) >0.90 after BMS have low (<6%) major adverse cardiac event rates (MACE). We hypothesized that baseline variables can predict post-stent FFR >0.90 and MACE after BMS.
METHODS: In 586 patients from the multicenter post-BMS FFR registry, we developed multivariable logistic regression models to identify clinical, angiographic, and hemodynamic variables associated with post-stent FFR >or=0.90 and 6-month MACE.
RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounders, baseline FFR (odds ratio [OR]: 5.0) and stent diameter (OR: 2.5 per millimeter) were predictive of post-stent FFR >0.90. Lower FFR (OR: 7.8); smaller stent diameter (OR: 3.7 per millimeter); longer stent length (OR: 1.0 per millimeter); and larger minimal luminal diameter (OR: 2.2 per millimeter) were predictors of MACE. In patients receiving 3-mm diameter stents, baseline FFR >0.70 yielded significantly higher likelihood of achieving post-stent FFR >0.90 than baseline FFR <or=0.70 (77% vs. 63%, p < 0.05); and in patients receiving <3-mm diameter stents, baseline FFR <0.50 was associated with higher MACE than FFR 0.50 to 0.70, and FFR >0.70 (40% vs. 15% vs. 13%, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving BMS, baseline FFR and stent diameter are predictors of post-stent FFR >0.90; and baseline FFR, stent diameter, stent length, and minimal luminal diameter are predictors of MACE. These variables may allow selection of patients who will have excellent results with BMS.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAsiaCardiovascular DiseasesCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseEuropeFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMetalsMiddle AgedOdds RatioPatient SelectionPredictive Value of TestsProsthesis DesignRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStentsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited States