Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2007
Impact of diabetes mellitus on outcome of patients undergoing carotid artery stenting: insights from a single center registry.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gurm Hitinder S, Rajagopal Vivek, Sachar Ravish, Abou-Chebl Alex, Kapadia Samir R, Bajzer Chris, Yadav Jay S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of diabetic status on outcome of patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).
BACKGROUND: Diabetes has been demonstrated to be a strong predictor of adverse outcome in patients undergoing coronary revascularization. Its significance in predicting outcome of patients undergoing carotid interventions has not been ascertained.
METHODS: We evaluated the short-term outcomes of 833 patients who underwent CAS at our institution. The primary outcome of this analysis was 30 day incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death.
RESULTS: Diabetes was present in 311 patients. Baseline characteristics were comparable between diabetics and nondiabetics except for the diabetics having a lower left ventricular ejection fraction, lower hemoglobin, and a higher body mass index at baseline. Further, they were more likely to have congestive heart failure and coronary artery disease. There was no difference in the incidence of stroke (1.9% versus 2.7%,), myocardial infarction (MI) (2.6% versus 1.9%), death (3.9% versus 2.5%), or the composite of death stroke or MI (6.8% versus 5.9%) at 30 days between diabetics and nondiabetics. Similar results were seen when the analysis was restricted to patients treated with an emboli protection device. Diabetes was not a risk factor for adverse outcome after CAS after multivariate adjustment.
CONCLUSION: Diabetics undergoing CAS are more likely to have associated co-morbidities. However despite this handicap, their short term outcome after CAS is similar to that of nondiabetics.
BACKGROUND: Diabetes has been demonstrated to be a strong predictor of adverse outcome in patients undergoing coronary revascularization. Its significance in predicting outcome of patients undergoing carotid interventions has not been ascertained.
METHODS: We evaluated the short-term outcomes of 833 patients who underwent CAS at our institution. The primary outcome of this analysis was 30 day incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death.
RESULTS: Diabetes was present in 311 patients. Baseline characteristics were comparable between diabetics and nondiabetics except for the diabetics having a lower left ventricular ejection fraction, lower hemoglobin, and a higher body mass index at baseline. Further, they were more likely to have congestive heart failure and coronary artery disease. There was no difference in the incidence of stroke (1.9% versus 2.7%,), myocardial infarction (MI) (2.6% versus 1.9%), death (3.9% versus 2.5%), or the composite of death stroke or MI (6.8% versus 5.9%) at 30 days between diabetics and nondiabetics. Similar results were seen when the analysis was restricted to patients treated with an emboli protection device. Diabetes was not a risk factor for adverse outcome after CAS after multivariate adjustment.
CONCLUSION: Diabetics undergoing CAS are more likely to have associated co-morbidities. However despite this handicap, their short term outcome after CAS is similar to that of nondiabetics.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationCarotid Artery DiseasesCarotid Artery, CommonCase-Control StudiesDiabetes ComplicationsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionOhioPredictive Value of TestsRegistriesRegression AnalysisResearch DesignRisk FactorsStentsStrokeSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsTreatment Outcome