MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.09.006

Медицинская библиотека · American heart journal · 2004

Exploring options for improving healthcare.

Wang Stanley S, Mendelson Daniel N, Schulman Kevin A, Mark Daniel B

Consensus StatementСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

New medical technologies generally must receive clearance or approval for marketing by the US Food and Drug Administration and be covered by an insurer, such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, before becoming available for widespread clinical use. These 2 approval processes are discrete and usually occur sequentially rather than collaboratively and simultaneously. To explore potential mechanisms for increasing regulatory collaboration between these 2 key health care agencies, the Duke Clinical Research Institute and Health Strategies Consultancy convened an informal meeting of agency, academic, and industry leaders on December 8 and 9, 2002, titled "Registration/Approval and Coverage/Payment: Exploring Options for Improving Healthcare." This article arises from the discussion at this conference; it does not represent the official views of any person or institution involved. Although the group did not attempt to reach a consensus, it examined several important issues surrounding this regulatory debate. Herein are proposed options for enhancing regulatory efficiency through greater coordination between the FDA and CMS, and discussion of these proposals from the perspectives of members of both agencies, members of stakeholder organizations, and academic observers.

Для цитирования: Wang Stanley S, Mendelson Daniel N, Schulman Kevin A, Mark Daniel B. Exploring options for improving healthcare.. American heart journal. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.09.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.