MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2026.101051

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of medical microbiology · 2026

"In vitro evaluation of sulbactam combination therapies for Acinetobacter baumannii".

Vaitheeswaran Karthick Kumar, Sood Seema, Soneja Manish, Ray Animesh, Pandey Shivam, Kapil Arti, Wig Naveet

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Acinetobacter baumannii, a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections in critically ill patients, is increasingly resistant to carbapenems, leading WHO to designate carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) as a critical priority pathogen. While the 2024 IDSA guidelines recommend sulbactam-based regimens as the cornerstone of therapy, high-dose sulbactam is effective only against isolates with MICs up to 16-32 μg/mL. This study aimed to describe the sulbactam MIC distribution and to evaluate MIC reduction and synergy when combined with β-lactam antibiotics against CRAB.

METHODS

CRAB isolates from respiratory samples of ventilator-associated pneumonia patients were tested using E-tests to determine MICs of individual antibiotics. Combinations of sulbactam with ceftriaxone, cefepime, and meropenem were assessed using the E-test cross method. Synergy was evaluated by the FIC index: synergy (≤0.5), additive (>0.5-1), indifference (>1-<4), and antagonism (≥4).

RESULTS

Thirty-five non-duplicate CRAB isolates were tested. All isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone, cefepime, and meropenem when tested individually, with MICs exceeding E-test detection limits. Hence, although sulbactam combinations significantly reduced MICs, the resulting values often remained above CLSI-defined susceptibility breakpoints. Notably, sulbactam alone showed an MIC50 of 12 μg/mL and an MIC90 of 24 μg/mL. In combination, sulbactam MIC50/MIC90 values were reduced to 8/24 μg/mL with ceftriaxone, 6/16 μg/mL with cefepime, and 8/24 μg/mL with meropenem. Sulbactam-cefepime showed the highest synergy (11.43 %) and additive effects (34.29 %), followed by sulbactam-ceftriaxone (2.86 % synergy; 31.43 % additive). Sulbactam-meropenem showed no synergy but 31.43 % additive effects. No antagonism was observed with any combination.

CONCLUSION

Combining sulbactam with β-lactams, particularly cefepime, significantly reduced sulbactam MICs. However, the β-lactam MICs themselves remained largely within not-susceptible ranges, highlighting that the observed benefit was confined primarily to sulbactam rather than the companion β-lactams. These findings supported further clinical studies of high-dose sulbactam-β-lactam combinations to optimize the pharmacodynamic efficacy of sulbactam against CRAB strains with elevated MICs.

Для цитирования: Vaitheeswaran Karthick Kumar, Sood Seema, Soneja Manish, Ray Animesh, Pandey Shivam, Kapil Arti, Wig Naveet. "In vitro evaluation of sulbactam combination therapies for Acinetobacter baumannii".. Indian journal of medical microbiology. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2026.101051.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.