Physiotherapy · 2026
Corrigendum to "Practitioner guidance for implementing low-volume high intensity interval training in people with coronary artery disease" [Physiotherapy 128 (2025) 101777].
Опубликованное исправлениеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Begg Brian, Powell Richard, Birkett Stefan T, Griffiths Thomas D, Drane Aimee L, Davey Hannah, Penn Zavia, Shave Rob E, Nicholls Simon, Lord Rachel N, Cowie Aynsley, McGregor Gordon, Ingle Lee
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: High intensity interval training (HIIT) is recognised within many international cardiac rehabilitation guidelines. In the United Kingdom, however, similar guidance does not exist; moderate intensity training regimens have traditionally been advocated. The aim is to provide a pragmatic technical report for practitioners working in CR to implement low-volume HIIT programmes for people with coronary artery disease (CAD).
METHODS: We characterised the acute physiological response to low-volume HIIT and outlined patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, along with clinical and safety considerations. Additionally, we explored its practical implications to facilitate implementation in clinical practice. A detailed methodology for the 10 × 1-min low-volume HIIT model is provided, including exercise training progression criteria RESULTS: Key considerations for familiarisation, supervision, prescription, monitoring, recording, and reporting are discussed, underpinned by an overview of the acute physiological response to the training modality.
CONCLUSIONS: We anticipate that this pragmatic evidence-based technical report will support practitioners in implementing low-volume HIIT in routine clinical practice, thus, allowing it to be offered as standard care alongside more traditional moderate intensity exercise training programmes.
METHODS: We characterised the acute physiological response to low-volume HIIT and outlined patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, along with clinical and safety considerations. Additionally, we explored its practical implications to facilitate implementation in clinical practice. A detailed methodology for the 10 × 1-min low-volume HIIT model is provided, including exercise training progression criteria RESULTS: Key considerations for familiarisation, supervision, prescription, monitoring, recording, and reporting are discussed, underpinned by an overview of the acute physiological response to the training modality.
CONCLUSIONS: We anticipate that this pragmatic evidence-based technical report will support practitioners in implementing low-volume HIIT in routine clinical practice, thus, allowing it to be offered as standard care alongside more traditional moderate intensity exercise training programmes.