Preoperative Imaging for Cochlear Implantation: A Global Consensus.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alzhrani Farid, Alahmadi Asma, Alshalan Afrah, Abdelsamad Yassin, Alsanosi Abdulrahman, Acharya Aanand, Kim Ana H, Macias Angel Ramos, Gantz Bruce, Buchman Craig, Jiang Dan, Cuda Domenico, Jankunaite Dovile, Sprinzl Georg, Olze Heidi, Anderson Ilona, Shami Ibrahim, Saunders James E, Gavilan Javier, Kutz Walter, Brown Kevin D, Rak Kristen, Telmesani Laila, Lassaletta Luis, Bance Manohar, Caversaccio Marco, Kameswaran Mohan, Zernotti Mario, Verhaert Nicolas, Adunka Oliver, Connolly Patrick F, Van de Heyning Paul, Caye-Thomasen Per, Skarzynski Piotr, Briggs Robert, Hagen Rudolf, Khalil Sherif, Ghossaini Soha N, Plontke Stefan K, O'Leary Stephen J, Agrawal Sumit K, Yamasoba Tatsuya, Lenarz Thomas, Stöver Timo, Topsakal Vedat, Van Rompaey Vincent, Hagr Abdulrahman
Аннотация
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among international cochlear implantation experts using a 112-item questionnaire. The study explored imaging modalities, anatomical targets, evaluated parameters, and different imaging approaches' perceived value and risks. Participants were recruited from a global consortium of otolaryngology, otology, neurotology, and cochlear implant surgery professionals.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine practitioners from 36 centers in 16 countries completed the survey (95.1% response rate). All used computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative evaluation; MRI was deemed more valuable for diagnosis and candidacy assessment, while CT was preferred for surgical planning. Nearly half utilized additional imaging modalities, with functional MRI being the most common (20.5%). Additionally, 79.5% of respondents reported using image-based surgical planning software.
DISCUSSION: Results show a universal reliance on CT and MRI for cochlear implant evaluations, with MRI aiding diagnosis and CT focusing on surgical planning. Advanced imaging techniques may emerge in specific clinical cases.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Modern imaging practices and their potential changes can enhance protocol development and improve preoperative evaluations, ultimately boosting patient safety and outcomes in cochlear implantation.