La Radiologia medica · 2025
Evaluation of sustainable diagnostic approaches in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Masperi Andrea, Girlando Cristiano Michele, Cubadda Valerio, Pesenti Aurora, Muscettola Giuseppe, Buonsanti Giuseppe, Aurora Gaeta, Gandini Sara, Petralia Giuseppe
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Assessing bone metastases in metastatic breast cancer is challenging. Due to rising concerns over energy use and emissions, energy-efficient imaging is essential. This study aimed to compare three diagnostic imaging approaches used in therapy monitoring of MBC patients, evaluating both their environmental impact-quantified by energy consumption and related greenhouse gas emissions-and their biological cost, defined as patient exposure to ionizing radiation and contrast media volume.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 70 patients with bone-dominant metastatic breast cancer who underwent WB-MRI (DL1) and either FDG-PET/CT (DL2) or bone scintigraphy (BS) with CT of chest, abdomen, and pelvis (CT-CAP) (DL3). We compared scan time, energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions (kgCO2e), radiation dose, and contrast media usage across these diagnostic pathways. Energy consumption was calculated using protocol-defined active and idle phases, while biological exposure was assessed from institutional RIS-PACS records.
RESULTS: DL1 had the highest energy consumption (10.36 ± 0.11 kWh/patient) and GHG emissions (2.53 ± 0.03 kgCO2e). DL2 showed moderate energy use (4.08 ± 0.38 kWh/patient) and GHG emissions (0.99 ± 0.09 kgCO2e), which significantly increased with repeat scans. DL3 exhibited the lowest environmental impact (7.60 ± 1.07 kWh; 1.85 ± 0.26 kgCO2e), though required multiple visits and higher contrast media and radiation doses.
CONCLUSION: WB-MRI offers a biologically safer alternative for treatment monitoring in metastatic breast cancer, yet its environmental footprint is substantial. FDG-PET/CT represents a more sustainable imaging option if repeated scans are minimized. Integrated imaging pathways and low-energy technologies should guide future diagnostic strategies.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 70 patients with bone-dominant metastatic breast cancer who underwent WB-MRI (DL1) and either FDG-PET/CT (DL2) or bone scintigraphy (BS) with CT of chest, abdomen, and pelvis (CT-CAP) (DL3). We compared scan time, energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions (kgCO2e), radiation dose, and contrast media usage across these diagnostic pathways. Energy consumption was calculated using protocol-defined active and idle phases, while biological exposure was assessed from institutional RIS-PACS records.
RESULTS: DL1 had the highest energy consumption (10.36 ± 0.11 kWh/patient) and GHG emissions (2.53 ± 0.03 kgCO2e). DL2 showed moderate energy use (4.08 ± 0.38 kWh/patient) and GHG emissions (0.99 ± 0.09 kgCO2e), which significantly increased with repeat scans. DL3 exhibited the lowest environmental impact (7.60 ± 1.07 kWh; 1.85 ± 0.26 kgCO2e), though required multiple visits and higher contrast media and radiation doses.
CONCLUSION: WB-MRI offers a biologically safer alternative for treatment monitoring in metastatic breast cancer, yet its environmental footprint is substantial. FDG-PET/CT represents a more sustainable imaging option if repeated scans are minimized. Integrated imaging pathways and low-energy technologies should guide future diagnostic strategies.