Prehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND

Evidence supporting prehabilitation before cardiac procedures is growing, but the efficacy of different components remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim was to assess the efficacy of prehabilitation on clinical outcomes based on recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The secondary aim was to identify effective intervention and which patient subgroups benefit most.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Library for RCTs comparing prehabilitation with standard care in cardiac patients up to August 2024. Trials were screened by 2 reviewers and meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Forty-four RCTs including 3,925 patients were identified. Prehabilitation improved preprocedural functional capacity (6-minute walk distance) and recovery (in-hospital length of stay, intensive care unit stay, and occurrence of postprocedural pneumonia). Six trials (n = 600) showed improved 6-minute walk distance (mean difference [MD] 68.87 m; 95% CI: 12.76-124.98 m; P = 0.020). In 18 studies (n = 1,568), length of stay was shorter (MD -0.95 days; 95% CI: -1.77 to -0.13 days; P = 0.026) and meta-regression showed greater effect in studies including more women (P = 0.015). In 16 trials (n = 1,149), intensive care unit stay was reduced (MD -6.03 hours; 95% CI: -12.01 to -0.06 hours; P = 0.048). In 5 studies (n = 729), postprocedural pneumonia occurred less frequently (OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.15-0.72; P = 0.017). The analysis revealed substantial heterogeneity and risk of bias. Analysis of specific components showed no consistent effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Prehabilitation before cardiac procedures may enhance preprocedural functional capacity and postprocedural recovery, particularly in women. Further multicenter studies are needed.