Digital health · 2025
A comparative study on the application of large language models: Deepseek-R1, GPT-4o, and Claude-Sonnet-4 in post-cardiac surgery rehabilitation-A cross-sectional study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Wenbo, Li Qiujie
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the performance of three advanced Chinese large language models (LLMs)-DeepSeek-R1, GPT-4o, and Claude-Sonnet-4-in supporting patient education during post-cardiac surgery rehabilitation.
METHODS: A total of 35 patient-centered questions were developed based on clinical guidelines, covering five core domains: postoperative care, medication and diet, mental health, complication prevention, and physical activity. Each model was prompted with the same questions five times. Responses were independently assessed by clinical experts for accuracy, completeness, readability (using FRE and FKGL), and reproducibility under repeated prompting. Statistical analyses were conducted using analysis of variance and post-hoc least significant difference (LSD) tests.
RESULTS: DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated the highest overall performance in terms of accuracy (mean score: 4.64) and completeness (4.20), and achieved the highest response stability (85.7%). GPT-4o outperformed the others in readability (FRE: 53.19) and linguistic fluency but showed lower reproducibility (62.9%). Claude-Sonnet-4 showed moderate and variable performance, with limitations in clinical detail. All observed differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: DeepSeek-R1 is most suitable for structured, guideline-based rehabilitation education. GPT-4o may be preferable in emotionally supportive or patient-facing scenarios due to its superior readability. Claude-Sonnet-4, while less consistent, may offer stylistic balance in diverse communication settings. Overall, LLMs show promising potential in digital cardiac rehabilitation, but task-specific model alignment remains essential.
METHODS: A total of 35 patient-centered questions were developed based on clinical guidelines, covering five core domains: postoperative care, medication and diet, mental health, complication prevention, and physical activity. Each model was prompted with the same questions five times. Responses were independently assessed by clinical experts for accuracy, completeness, readability (using FRE and FKGL), and reproducibility under repeated prompting. Statistical analyses were conducted using analysis of variance and post-hoc least significant difference (LSD) tests.
RESULTS: DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated the highest overall performance in terms of accuracy (mean score: 4.64) and completeness (4.20), and achieved the highest response stability (85.7%). GPT-4o outperformed the others in readability (FRE: 53.19) and linguistic fluency but showed lower reproducibility (62.9%). Claude-Sonnet-4 showed moderate and variable performance, with limitations in clinical detail. All observed differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: DeepSeek-R1 is most suitable for structured, guideline-based rehabilitation education. GPT-4o may be preferable in emotionally supportive or patient-facing scenarios due to its superior readability. Claude-Sonnet-4, while less consistent, may offer stylistic balance in diverse communication settings. Overall, LLMs show promising potential in digital cardiac rehabilitation, but task-specific model alignment remains essential.