British journal of community nursing · 2025
Lymphoedema and heart failure staff educational needs analysis: insights from a UK online survey. Part 2: quantitative findings.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cooper Garry, Gabe-Walters Marie, Humphries Ioan, Edmunds Linda, Taylor Hayley, Morgan Karen, Thomas Melanie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Managing patients with coexisting heart failure and chronic peripheral oedema or lymphoedema presents clinical challenges, particularly regarding compression therapy.
AIMS: This evaluation assessed healthcare professionals' roles, confidence, training needs and use of guidance in managing heart failure and chronic peripheral oedema or lymphoedema.
METHODS: A UK-wide service evaluation survey was completed by 342 healthcare professionals. Descriptive quantitative analysis was conducted.
RESULTS: Compression-related care was undertaken by 97% of lymphoedema practitioners and 91% of nurses, but only 3% of heart failure professionals. Over 90% of participants requested further training, with 59% of lymphoedema staff receiving education in the last 5 years, compared to 21% of heart failure specialists. Only 16% of heart failure staff had read key compression guidelines. Top education priorities included referral pathways (64%) and compression in heart failure. Multidisciplinary webinars were the most preferred format (66%).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the need for integrated education, shared care models and better dissemination of compression guidance to support safe and effective care for this multimorbid population.
AIMS: This evaluation assessed healthcare professionals' roles, confidence, training needs and use of guidance in managing heart failure and chronic peripheral oedema or lymphoedema.
METHODS: A UK-wide service evaluation survey was completed by 342 healthcare professionals. Descriptive quantitative analysis was conducted.
RESULTS: Compression-related care was undertaken by 97% of lymphoedema practitioners and 91% of nurses, but only 3% of heart failure professionals. Over 90% of participants requested further training, with 59% of lymphoedema staff receiving education in the last 5 years, compared to 21% of heart failure specialists. Only 16% of heart failure staff had read key compression guidelines. Top education priorities included referral pathways (64%) and compression in heart failure. Multidisciplinary webinars were the most preferred format (66%).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the need for integrated education, shared care models and better dissemination of compression guidance to support safe and effective care for this multimorbid population.