Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2020
The use of radiographic imaging technologies by general dentists in Ontario, Canada.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gillies Rolland C, Quiñonez Carlos, Wood Robert E, Lam Ernest W N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional digital imaging technologies, the methods used by general dentists to limit patient exposure to ionizing radiation, and the impact of dentists' education on imaging technologies and patient dose-reducing techniques.
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional, web-based survey of all general dentists in Ontario was conducted.
RESULTS: Responses from 1332 (14.7%) of the 9052 registered general dentists in Ontario were included in the analysis. Approximately 89% reported using digital intraoral technology, 81.1% reported owning panoramic imaging systems, 71.2% reported making referrals for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and 9.5% reported including CBCT in their practices. CBCT was most commonly used for dental implant treatment planning (85.8%), followed by endodontics (45.4%), evaluation of pathology (39.6%), and surgical assessment for impacted teeth or difficult extractions (36.8%). Approximately 32.7% used only collimators with a long focal point-receptor distance and 8% used only rectangular collimation; 86.9% reported using a thyroid collar when imaging patients. Differences in educational backgrounds correlated with differences in the use of imaging and dose-reducing techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: There is widespread adoption of digital imaging technologies by general dentists in Ontario, including CBCT. Greater implementation of long and/or rectangular collimation could markedly reduce the ionizing radiation dose to patients. Changes in dental education curricula and continuing education course offerings may address these issues.
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional, web-based survey of all general dentists in Ontario was conducted.
RESULTS: Responses from 1332 (14.7%) of the 9052 registered general dentists in Ontario were included in the analysis. Approximately 89% reported using digital intraoral technology, 81.1% reported owning panoramic imaging systems, 71.2% reported making referrals for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and 9.5% reported including CBCT in their practices. CBCT was most commonly used for dental implant treatment planning (85.8%), followed by endodontics (45.4%), evaluation of pathology (39.6%), and surgical assessment for impacted teeth or difficult extractions (36.8%). Approximately 32.7% used only collimators with a long focal point-receptor distance and 8% used only rectangular collimation; 86.9% reported using a thyroid collar when imaging patients. Differences in educational backgrounds correlated with differences in the use of imaging and dose-reducing techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: There is widespread adoption of digital imaging technologies by general dentists in Ontario, including CBCT. Greater implementation of long and/or rectangular collimation could markedly reduce the ionizing radiation dose to patients. Changes in dental education curricula and continuing education course offerings may address these issues.