American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025
Improving outcomes in acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of home-based compared to hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation and usual care: 3-4 months (end of the program) and 9-10 months (6 months after the end of the program).
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Marti Eva, Hartopo Anggoro Budi, Haryani, Rahayu Margareta Hesti, Diana Riris, Yunitri Ninik
Аннотация
AIM: To assess the effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) in improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and other outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), compared to hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and usual care.
METHODS: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and included a comprehensive search across MEDLINE, CINAHL, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, Clinical Key, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to June 2023. A total of 19 studies with 2822 participants were included. Eligible RCTs assessed the impact of HBCR on ACS patients, comparing it with hospital-based CR or usual care. The primary outcome was QoL, with secondary outcomes including cardiovascular capacity, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and rehospitalization rates. Statistical analysis was conducted using a random-effects model in R Statistic.
RESULTS: HBCR improves QoL compared to all comparators (hospital-based CR and usual care) (SMD 0.17, 95 % CI 0.00 to 0.33). HBCR was equally effective as hospital-based CR in enhancing QoL, peak VO2, 6-min walk distance (6 MWD), lipid profiles, and blood pressure. Compared to usual care, HBCR significantly improved QoL (SMD 0.29, 95 % CI 0.11 to 0.46) and HDL-cholesterol level (SMD 0.18, 95 % CI 0.02 to 0.34), while reducing triglyceride level more effectively (SMD -0.34, 95 % CI -0.57 to -0.11). However, no significant differences were observed between HBCR and usual care in terms of peak VO2, rehospitalization rates, LDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol, or blood pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: HBCR significantly improves QoL and is equally effective as hospital-based CR across all measured outcomes. Compared to usual care, HBCR leads to significant improvements in specific aspects of QoL as a primary outcome, as well as in HDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels. However, its impact on other outcomes, such as peak VO2, LDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol, and blood pressure, is not consistently significant.
METHODS: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and included a comprehensive search across MEDLINE, CINAHL, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, Clinical Key, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to June 2023. A total of 19 studies with 2822 participants were included. Eligible RCTs assessed the impact of HBCR on ACS patients, comparing it with hospital-based CR or usual care. The primary outcome was QoL, with secondary outcomes including cardiovascular capacity, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and rehospitalization rates. Statistical analysis was conducted using a random-effects model in R Statistic.
RESULTS: HBCR improves QoL compared to all comparators (hospital-based CR and usual care) (SMD 0.17, 95 % CI 0.00 to 0.33). HBCR was equally effective as hospital-based CR in enhancing QoL, peak VO2, 6-min walk distance (6 MWD), lipid profiles, and blood pressure. Compared to usual care, HBCR significantly improved QoL (SMD 0.29, 95 % CI 0.11 to 0.46) and HDL-cholesterol level (SMD 0.18, 95 % CI 0.02 to 0.34), while reducing triglyceride level more effectively (SMD -0.34, 95 % CI -0.57 to -0.11). However, no significant differences were observed between HBCR and usual care in terms of peak VO2, rehospitalization rates, LDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol, or blood pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: HBCR significantly improves QoL and is equally effective as hospital-based CR across all measured outcomes. Compared to usual care, HBCR leads to significant improvements in specific aspects of QoL as a primary outcome, as well as in HDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels. However, its impact on other outcomes, such as peak VO2, LDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol, and blood pressure, is not consistently significant.