Joint bone spine · 2016
Decreased patient exposure to ionizing radiation during interventional rheumatology procedures after optimization of protection.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cozic Céline, Audran Fabien, Blanchard Christophe, David Christophe, Andre Vincent, Caulier Michel, Varin Stéphane, Tanguy Gilles, Dimet Jérôme, Cormier Grégoire
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To decrease radiation exposure of patients undergoing interventional rheumatology procedures, without adversely affecting quality of care.
METHODS: The radiation dose received, assessed by the dose-area product (DAP), was measured during 283 intraarticular injections performed under fluoroscopic guidance between May and July 2013. Then, three steps were taken to decrease patients' radiation exposure: a copper filter was added, the anti-scatter grid was removed, and exposure cell sensitivity was set at the highest value. DAP was measured during 158 intraarticular injections performed in 2014 with these measures in place.
RESULTS: Mean DAP before optimization was 175μGray·m2 during facet joint injections (n=4) and 43μGray·m2 during hip injections but was less than 20μGray·m2 for injections into the shoulders (15.7μGray·m2), ankles (7.7μGray·m2), wrists (3.7μGray·m2), and fingers (3.3μGray·m2). After optimization, DAP decreased markedly for all injection sites, by 52% (shoulders) to 87% (facet joints, 22.7μGray·m2). Decreases occurred at all three steps of the procedure, i.e., patient installation, injection, and last image hold. Exposure during facet joint injections varied from 84 (54.5-108.5) μGray·m2 when body mass index (BMI) was <25kg/m2 to 228.9 (161.3-340.4)μGray·m2 when BMI was>30kg/m2.
CONCLUSION: Simple technical changes translate into large decreases in patient radiation exposure during fluoroscopically-guided injections, particularly at the facet joints and in obese patients.
METHODS: The radiation dose received, assessed by the dose-area product (DAP), was measured during 283 intraarticular injections performed under fluoroscopic guidance between May and July 2013. Then, three steps were taken to decrease patients' radiation exposure: a copper filter was added, the anti-scatter grid was removed, and exposure cell sensitivity was set at the highest value. DAP was measured during 158 intraarticular injections performed in 2014 with these measures in place.
RESULTS: Mean DAP before optimization was 175μGray·m2 during facet joint injections (n=4) and 43μGray·m2 during hip injections but was less than 20μGray·m2 for injections into the shoulders (15.7μGray·m2), ankles (7.7μGray·m2), wrists (3.7μGray·m2), and fingers (3.3μGray·m2). After optimization, DAP decreased markedly for all injection sites, by 52% (shoulders) to 87% (facet joints, 22.7μGray·m2). Decreases occurred at all three steps of the procedure, i.e., patient installation, injection, and last image hold. Exposure during facet joint injections varied from 84 (54.5-108.5) μGray·m2 when body mass index (BMI) was <25kg/m2 to 228.9 (161.3-340.4)μGray·m2 when BMI was>30kg/m2.
CONCLUSION: Simple technical changes translate into large decreases in patient radiation exposure during fluoroscopically-guided injections, particularly at the facet joints and in obese patients.