JACC. Advances · 2024
Is 70% Achievable? Hospital-Level Variation in Rates of Cardiac Rehabilitation Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pack Quinn R, Keys Taylor, Priya Aruna, Pekow Penelope S, Keteyian Steven J, Thompson Michael P, D'Aunno Thomas, Lindenauer Peter K, Lagu Tara
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Despite national goals to enroll 70% of cardiac rehabilitation (CR)-eligible patients, enrollment remains low.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the treating hospital influences CR enrollment nationally.
METHODS: We included Fee-for-Service Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥66 years who were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, or heart valve repair/replacement. We examined: 1) a risk-standardized model to assess comparative hospital rates; 2) a linear regression model to identify hospital factors associated with rates of risk-standardized CR; and 3) a hierarchical generalized linear model to calculate the hospital median OR.
RESULTS: At 3,420 hospitals, we identified 264,970 eligible patients. A minority of hospitals (n = 1,446; 38%) performed cardiac surgery, but these hospitals cared for the majority (n = 242,875; 92%) of all eligible patients. Subsequent analyses were limited to these hospitals. The median risk-standardized CR enrollment rate was low (22%) and varied 10-fold across hospitals (10th, 90th percentile: 3%, 42%). Factors associated with higher hospital performance were Midwest location, higher number of hospital beds, directly affiliated CR program, and <1 mile distance between the hospital and closest CR facility. The national hospital median OR was 2.1.
CONCLUSIONS: The treating hospital plays a key role in facilitating CR enrollment after discharge. Fewer than 1% of U.S. hospitals achieved a risk-standardized CR enrollment rate of >70%. Hospitals with cardiac surgery capability care for more than 90% of all CR-eligible patients and may be a logical place to focus improvement efforts.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the treating hospital influences CR enrollment nationally.
METHODS: We included Fee-for-Service Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥66 years who were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, or heart valve repair/replacement. We examined: 1) a risk-standardized model to assess comparative hospital rates; 2) a linear regression model to identify hospital factors associated with rates of risk-standardized CR; and 3) a hierarchical generalized linear model to calculate the hospital median OR.
RESULTS: At 3,420 hospitals, we identified 264,970 eligible patients. A minority of hospitals (n = 1,446; 38%) performed cardiac surgery, but these hospitals cared for the majority (n = 242,875; 92%) of all eligible patients. Subsequent analyses were limited to these hospitals. The median risk-standardized CR enrollment rate was low (22%) and varied 10-fold across hospitals (10th, 90th percentile: 3%, 42%). Factors associated with higher hospital performance were Midwest location, higher number of hospital beds, directly affiliated CR program, and <1 mile distance between the hospital and closest CR facility. The national hospital median OR was 2.1.
CONCLUSIONS: The treating hospital plays a key role in facilitating CR enrollment after discharge. Fewer than 1% of U.S. hospitals achieved a risk-standardized CR enrollment rate of >70%. Hospitals with cardiac surgery capability care for more than 90% of all CR-eligible patients and may be a logical place to focus improvement efforts.