American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation · 2024
Tele-Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Hybrid Form Compared With Conventional Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Impact in the Medium and Long Term.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Racodon Michaël, Sergeant David, Mucci Patrick, Fabre Claudine
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to study the noninferiority of functional capacity and quality of life between hybrid tele-pulmonary rehabilitation and pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic respiratory diseases.
DESIGN: Sixty-four participants underwent a 5-wk pulmonary rehabilitation program and were divided into two groups: a pulmonary rehabilitation group and a hybrid tele-pulmonary rehabilitation group.The 6-Minute Walk Test, a time limit test, the Single-Leg Stance Test, and the Sit-to-Stand Test were used to evaluate functional capacity, whereas quality of life was self-evaluated using the VQ11 questionnaire.
RESULTS: Both groups had improved their performances in the 6-Minute Walk Test and time limit test, their strength capacity in the Sit-to-Stand Test, and their balance in the Single-Leg Stance Test to a similar extent (P < 0.001) after the 5-wk program. For the quality of life, a more pronounced improvement for the hybrid tele-pulmonary rehabilitation group was observed (P < 0.001) 7 wks and 1 yr after the end of the program.
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness hybrid tele-pulmonary rehabilitation protocol seems to be comparable to that of the conventional model. Hybrid tele-pulmonary rehabilitation is not inferior with improvements in functional capacity and quality of life.
DESIGN: Sixty-four participants underwent a 5-wk pulmonary rehabilitation program and were divided into two groups: a pulmonary rehabilitation group and a hybrid tele-pulmonary rehabilitation group.The 6-Minute Walk Test, a time limit test, the Single-Leg Stance Test, and the Sit-to-Stand Test were used to evaluate functional capacity, whereas quality of life was self-evaluated using the VQ11 questionnaire.
RESULTS: Both groups had improved their performances in the 6-Minute Walk Test and time limit test, their strength capacity in the Sit-to-Stand Test, and their balance in the Single-Leg Stance Test to a similar extent (P < 0.001) after the 5-wk program. For the quality of life, a more pronounced improvement for the hybrid tele-pulmonary rehabilitation group was observed (P < 0.001) 7 wks and 1 yr after the end of the program.
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness hybrid tele-pulmonary rehabilitation protocol seems to be comparable to that of the conventional model. Hybrid tele-pulmonary rehabilitation is not inferior with improvements in functional capacity and quality of life.