Current problems in cardiology · 2023
The impact of Virtual Reality on Anxiety and Functional Capacity in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bashir Zubair, Misquith Chelsea, Shahab Ahmed, Has Phinnara, Bukhari Syed
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The overall utilization of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is low despite its proven benefits in secondary prevention. Virtual reality (VR), a novel method of rehabilitation, may increase overall compliance. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to synthesize evidence and report whether the addition of VR leads to an improvement in anxiety and functional capacity (FC) compared to standard CR.
METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was used to search the online databases for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on VR-CR. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata SE version 17.0 (College Station, TX) and RevMan5.
RESULTS: A total of 747 study participants were part of 7 studies included in the meta-analysis. Three studies were part of the narrative synthesis. Anxiety showed significant improvement in VR-CR compared to standard CR (SMD -0.32, 95% CI -0.61, -0.03). There was no significant improvement in FC between VR-CR and the standard CR (SMD 0.077, 95% CI -1.24, 1.32).
CONCLUSION: VR-CR significantly improved CR-related anxiety compared to standard CR. However, no significant improvement in FC was found in VR-CR compared to the standard CR. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of non-immersive and immersive VR on FC.
METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was used to search the online databases for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on VR-CR. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata SE version 17.0 (College Station, TX) and RevMan5.
RESULTS: A total of 747 study participants were part of 7 studies included in the meta-analysis. Three studies were part of the narrative synthesis. Anxiety showed significant improvement in VR-CR compared to standard CR (SMD -0.32, 95% CI -0.61, -0.03). There was no significant improvement in FC between VR-CR and the standard CR (SMD 0.077, 95% CI -1.24, 1.32).
CONCLUSION: VR-CR significantly improved CR-related anxiety compared to standard CR. However, no significant improvement in FC was found in VR-CR compared to the standard CR. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of non-immersive and immersive VR on FC.