Disability and rehabilitation · 2022
Adaptation and validation of the cardiovascular version of the Return-to-Work Obstacles and Self-Efficacy Scale (ROSES-CVD) to the Italian context.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gragnano Andrea, Corbière Marc, Picco Eleonora, Negrini Alessia, Savioli Gaia, Conti Massimo, Corsiglia Luca, Miglioretti Massimo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Effective cardiac rehabilitation interventions must provide adequate support to overcome psychosocial return-to-work (RTW) barriers. No validated instrument is available for this aim for cardiovascular patients. The Return-to-work Obstacles and Self-Efficacy Scale (ROSES) measures RTW obstacles workers perceive and the self-efficacy for overcoming them through 46 items and ten dimensions. This study aimed to adapt and validate ROSES for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the Italian context.
METHODS: This prospective study involved 183 CVD working patients at baseline and 121 six months later. ROSES-CVD internal consistency, construct, and predictive validity was evaluated with Cronbach's α, Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), and ANCOVAs.
RESULTS: CFAs adequately replicated the original ROSES model (CFI = .92-.96; TLI = .91-.94; RMSEA = .042-.057; SRMR = .046-.071) with α close or higher than .70 for all dimensions. Four ROSES-CVD dimensions significantly predicted the number of days to RTW controlling for age, gender, educational level, and surgery type. Workers who perceived salient RTW obstacles and low self-efficacy in any of these dimensions in mean returned to work from 38 to 53 days later.
CONCLUSIONS: The study supported the validity and reliability of ROSES-CVD. This tool can be used in rehabilitation to detect CVD patients at risk of a longer RTW process and define appropriate cardiac rehabilitation intervention.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONVocational rehabilitation interventions should provide tailor-made support to overcome RTW barriers based on individual risk assessmentThe Italian translation of ROSES-CVD is a valid and reliable tool to measure psychosocial barriers to RTW among CVD working patientsThe use of ROSES-CVD would allow detection of CVD patients at risk of longer RTW processAdministering ROSES-CVD can help focus traditional vocational intervention on individually relevant obstacles to RTW.
METHODS: This prospective study involved 183 CVD working patients at baseline and 121 six months later. ROSES-CVD internal consistency, construct, and predictive validity was evaluated with Cronbach's α, Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), and ANCOVAs.
RESULTS: CFAs adequately replicated the original ROSES model (CFI = .92-.96; TLI = .91-.94; RMSEA = .042-.057; SRMR = .046-.071) with α close or higher than .70 for all dimensions. Four ROSES-CVD dimensions significantly predicted the number of days to RTW controlling for age, gender, educational level, and surgery type. Workers who perceived salient RTW obstacles and low self-efficacy in any of these dimensions in mean returned to work from 38 to 53 days later.
CONCLUSIONS: The study supported the validity and reliability of ROSES-CVD. This tool can be used in rehabilitation to detect CVD patients at risk of a longer RTW process and define appropriate cardiac rehabilitation intervention.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONVocational rehabilitation interventions should provide tailor-made support to overcome RTW barriers based on individual risk assessmentThe Italian translation of ROSES-CVD is a valid and reliable tool to measure psychosocial barriers to RTW among CVD working patientsThe use of ROSES-CVD would allow detection of CVD patients at risk of longer RTW processAdministering ROSES-CVD can help focus traditional vocational intervention on individually relevant obstacles to RTW.