Evaluation of a Novel Step Training Mobile App Intervention in Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation: A Single-Arm Prospective Cohort Study.

Objective

To establish the usability, acceptability, safety, and exercise adherence of a step training mobile app.

Design

A single-arm prospective cohort study.

Setting

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia. Subjects: Twenty-six cardiopulmonary rehabilitation participants. Intervention: Twelve weeks of step training using the mobile app Clock Yourself. Participants used Clock Yourself at home and during cardiopulmonary rehabilitation sessions, prescribed for a total of 15-20 minutes three times a week. Main Measures: The primary outcomes of interest were usability and acceptability and were measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Attitudes to Falls-Related Interventions Scale (AFRIS) questionnaire, respectively. Safety and adherence were measured by self-report and participant diary, respectively. Secondary outcomes measuring changes in stepping, gait, balance, and physical performance included Manual test of Choice Stepping Reaction Time (CSRT-M), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Gait speed with and without a cognitive dual task (DT) and Timed Up and Go with and without a cognitive DT (TUG and TUGcog).

Results

Twenty-one participants completed the study. Clock Yourself was considered highly useable (SUS [median] = 82.5/100; interquartile range [IQR, 67.5-95], equating to an "A" rating [A-F scale]) and acceptable (AFRIS [median] = 38/42 [IQR, 31-41]). Participants practiced Clock Yourself for a median of 18.29 minutes per week and no adverse events were reported. At 12 weeks, mean change in CSRT-M, SPPB, gait speed, DT gait speed, TUG, and TUGcog were all statistically significant (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Twelve weeks of mobile app-based step training was safe and considered usable and acceptable by participants. On average, participants did not meet the prescribed practice dosage. Statistically significant changes were observed in all physical measures; however, results are confounded by participation in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and lack of control group.