Clinics and practice · 2022
Exercise Prescription and Progression Practices among US Cardiac Rehabilitation Clinics.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Krieger Joesi, McCann Nicholas, Bluhm Markaela, Zuhl Micah
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Little is known about exercise prescription practices in cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to understand how initial exercise is prescribed and how exercise intensity is progressed among cardiac patients enrolled in United States CR programs.
METHODS: A 22-question survey was sent out to US CR clinics.
RESULTS: Ninety-three clinics responded to the survey. RPE was the most commonly reported exercise intensity indicator used for prescribing exercise, followed by resting HR + 20-30 bpm. Exercise progression practices were also based on patient sustained RPE values.
CONCLUSIONS: Exercise prescription practice has become reliant on subjective indicators of exercise intensity. This may limit patient outcomes, such as improvement in functional measures.
METHODS: A 22-question survey was sent out to US CR clinics.
RESULTS: Ninety-three clinics responded to the survey. RPE was the most commonly reported exercise intensity indicator used for prescribing exercise, followed by resting HR + 20-30 bpm. Exercise progression practices were also based on patient sustained RPE values.
CONCLUSIONS: Exercise prescription practice has become reliant on subjective indicators of exercise intensity. This may limit patient outcomes, such as improvement in functional measures.