Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2019
Atrophic and hypertrophic photoaging: Clinical, histologic, and molecular features of 2 distinct phenotypes of photoaged skin.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sachs Dana L, Varani James, Chubb Heather, Fligiel Suzanne E G, Cui Yilei, Calderone Ken, Helfrich Yolanda, Fisher Gary J, Voorhees John J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Exposure to the sun causes premature skin aging, known as photoaging. Clinical features of photoaging vary widely among individuals. In one form, skin appears thin with telangiectasia, and in another form, skin appears thickened with coarse wrinkles. Etiologic, clinical, and therapeutic distinctions among different forms of photoaging remain largely unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical, histologic, and molecular features of hypertrophic and atrophic photoaging.
METHODS: In total, 53 individuals were clinically classified as having primarily atrophic or hypertrophic photoaging or neither (controls). Participants' demographic and sun exposure-related lifestyle data were captured by questionnaire. Fifteen clinical features of participants were qualitatively or quantitively scored. Facial biopsies were analyzed for gene expression and histologic characteristics.
RESULTS: Actinic and seborrheic keratosis, telangiectasia, and prior incidence of skin cancers were statistically significantly greater and photoaging scale severity, coarse wrinkles, thickness, and sallowness were significantly reduced in atrophic versus hypertrophic groups. Histology also revealed significantly less elastotic material in atrophic photoaging. Gene expression of matrix metalloproteinases and collagens did not differ between the 2 forms of photoaging.
LIMITATIONS: The study was not designed to identify other possible subtypes of photoaging.
CONCLUSION: Systematic, categorical, and quantitative clinical and histologic assessments distinguish atrophic and hypertrophic photoaging.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical, histologic, and molecular features of hypertrophic and atrophic photoaging.
METHODS: In total, 53 individuals were clinically classified as having primarily atrophic or hypertrophic photoaging or neither (controls). Participants' demographic and sun exposure-related lifestyle data were captured by questionnaire. Fifteen clinical features of participants were qualitatively or quantitively scored. Facial biopsies were analyzed for gene expression and histologic characteristics.
RESULTS: Actinic and seborrheic keratosis, telangiectasia, and prior incidence of skin cancers were statistically significantly greater and photoaging scale severity, coarse wrinkles, thickness, and sallowness were significantly reduced in atrophic versus hypertrophic groups. Histology also revealed significantly less elastotic material in atrophic photoaging. Gene expression of matrix metalloproteinases and collagens did not differ between the 2 forms of photoaging.
LIMITATIONS: The study was not designed to identify other possible subtypes of photoaging.
CONCLUSION: Systematic, categorical, and quantitative clinical and histologic assessments distinguish atrophic and hypertrophic photoaging.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAtrophyBiopsyBasal Cell CarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellCollagenFaceFemaleGene ExpressionHumansHypertrophyIncidenceKeratosis, ActinicKeratosis, SeborrheicLife StyleMaleMatrix MetalloproteinasesMiddle AgedPhenotypeSkinSkin AgingSkin NeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesTelangiectasisUltraviolet Rays