Critical pathways in cardiology · 2021
Prevalence, Clinical Factors, and Outcomes Associated With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schmitz Katie, Groth Nicole, Mullvain Richard, Renier Colleen, Oluleye Oludamilola, Benziger Catherine
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is an underrecognized clinical problem in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Various clinical disorders lead to MINOCA thus making treatment and diagnosis a challenge. We aimed to compare the clinical factors and outcomes of patients with MINOCA versus obstructive disease [myocardial infarction due to coronary artery disease (MI-CAD)] in a largely rural health system.
METHODS: Between May 1, 2009 and June 24, 2019, all consecutive ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients at Essentia Health were prospectively examined. We categorized patients into MI-CAD (obstructive plaque ≥ 50% with revascularization) or MINOCA (obstructive plaque < 50% with exclusion of other alternative cause). Outcomes included 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality, 30-day all-cause readmission and 30-day cardiac readmission.
RESULTS: There were 2170 patients included in the study; 2097 (96.6 %) had MI-CAD and 73 (3.4%) met the definition of MINOCA. Within the MINOCA group, the 3 most common presentations were supply-demand mismatch (28.8%), spontaneous coronary artery dissection (9.6%), and other etiology (60.3%). Only 10 (13 %) MINOCA patients had cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies obtained within 6 months. MINOCA patients were younger 61.6 versus 63.4 years with higher left ventricular function 51.6% versus 50.4% with less likelihood of prior myocardial infarction 4.1% versus 15.5% or congestive heart failure 2.7% versus 6.3% (P < 0.05). Compared with MI-CAD patients, MINOCA patients had similar 30-day mortality (7.1% vs. 8.2%; P = 0.70), 1-year mortality (10.4% vs. 8.2 %; P = 0.55), and 30-day cardiac readmission (8.7% vs. 9.6%; P = 0.29). MINOCA patients were less likely to be discharged on aspirin, betablockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers, or statins (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Though there was no difference in readmission and mortality between MINOCA and MI-CAD; use of secondary prevention medications and cardiac rehabilitation referral was low in MINOCA patients. Prospective studies will be relevant to assess effective medical therapy to improve outcomes in MINOCA patients.
METHODS: Between May 1, 2009 and June 24, 2019, all consecutive ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients at Essentia Health were prospectively examined. We categorized patients into MI-CAD (obstructive plaque ≥ 50% with revascularization) or MINOCA (obstructive plaque < 50% with exclusion of other alternative cause). Outcomes included 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality, 30-day all-cause readmission and 30-day cardiac readmission.
RESULTS: There were 2170 patients included in the study; 2097 (96.6 %) had MI-CAD and 73 (3.4%) met the definition of MINOCA. Within the MINOCA group, the 3 most common presentations were supply-demand mismatch (28.8%), spontaneous coronary artery dissection (9.6%), and other etiology (60.3%). Only 10 (13 %) MINOCA patients had cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies obtained within 6 months. MINOCA patients were younger 61.6 versus 63.4 years with higher left ventricular function 51.6% versus 50.4% with less likelihood of prior myocardial infarction 4.1% versus 15.5% or congestive heart failure 2.7% versus 6.3% (P < 0.05). Compared with MI-CAD patients, MINOCA patients had similar 30-day mortality (7.1% vs. 8.2%; P = 0.70), 1-year mortality (10.4% vs. 8.2 %; P = 0.55), and 30-day cardiac readmission (8.7% vs. 9.6%; P = 0.29). MINOCA patients were less likely to be discharged on aspirin, betablockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers, or statins (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Though there was no difference in readmission and mortality between MINOCA and MI-CAD; use of secondary prevention medications and cardiac rehabilitation referral was low in MINOCA patients. Prospective studies will be relevant to assess effective medical therapy to improve outcomes in MINOCA patients.