Heart & lung : the journal of critical care · 2020
Translation, adaptation, and psychometrically validation of an instrument to assess disease-related knowledge in Spanish-speaking cardiac rehabilitation participants: The Spanish CADE-Q SV.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ghisi Gabriela Lima de Melo, Fernandez Rosalía, Quesada Daniel, Anchique Claudia V, Gordillo Ximena, Loaiciga Blanca Arrieta, Reyes Patricia, Oh Paul
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To validate the Spanish Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire Short Version(CADE-QSV).
BACKGROUND: Knowledge assessment can tailor patient education strategies in CR.
METHODS: Ten CR experts culturally-adapted the translated tool and 249 CR patients in three countries participated in the psychometrically validation. The internal consistency was assessed using KR-20 and Cronbach's alpha. Distribution- and anchor-based methods were used to estimate the MCID for interpretability analysis. Factor structure, acceptability, floor and ceiling effects and discriminant validity were also assessed.
RESULTS: KR-20 was 0.75.Factor analysis revealed 5 factors, all internally consistent. Discriminant validity was supported by significant differences in educational level and family income at post-CR. Results showed that increases in knowledge can moderately increase mean steps per day, with MCID=3.00. Items were completed by 98% of participants. No evidence for ceiling/floor effects on total score. The area with the highest knowledge was nutrition and the lowest was medical condition.
CONCLUSION: The Spanish CADE-QSV demonstrated preliminary validity and reliability.
BACKGROUND: Knowledge assessment can tailor patient education strategies in CR.
METHODS: Ten CR experts culturally-adapted the translated tool and 249 CR patients in three countries participated in the psychometrically validation. The internal consistency was assessed using KR-20 and Cronbach's alpha. Distribution- and anchor-based methods were used to estimate the MCID for interpretability analysis. Factor structure, acceptability, floor and ceiling effects and discriminant validity were also assessed.
RESULTS: KR-20 was 0.75.Factor analysis revealed 5 factors, all internally consistent. Discriminant validity was supported by significant differences in educational level and family income at post-CR. Results showed that increases in knowledge can moderately increase mean steps per day, with MCID=3.00. Items were completed by 98% of participants. No evidence for ceiling/floor effects on total score. The area with the highest knowledge was nutrition and the lowest was medical condition.
CONCLUSION: The Spanish CADE-QSV demonstrated preliminary validity and reliability.