American journal of infection control · 2020
Examining instruments used to measure knowledge of catheter-associated urinary tract infection prevention in health care workers: A systematic review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abubakar Salisu, Boehnke Jan R, Burnett Emma, Smith Karen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is the most frequently occurring health care-associated infection among hospitalized patients. Adequate knowledge of CAUTI in health care workers supports effective prevention and control of the infection. This systematic review assesses instruments used to assess knowledge of CAUTI prevention in health care workers to inform future research. The catheter lifecycle model was used to evaluate the conceptual framework upon which the measurement instruments were based. Finally, the psychometric quality of these instruments was evaluated.
METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched for published studies and instruments. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments checklist was used to assess the psychometric quality reporting of the instruments.
RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the review inclusion criteria and 13 instruments were available for review. Most of the instruments did not address all knowledge components essential for CAUTI prevention as defined by the catheter lifecycle model. The psychometric quality of the instruments was not sufficiently evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS: Few instruments are available for CAUTI prevention knowledge measurement. The instruments were not closely aligned with the catheter lifecycle model as a framework. If CAUTI knowledge cannot be measured accurately using an effective instrument, this has the potential to impact negatively on clinical care and the focus of interventions. There is a need for a standardized instrument for the evaluation of CAUTI prevention knowledge so that targeted interventions can address knowledge deficits.
METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched for published studies and instruments. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments checklist was used to assess the psychometric quality reporting of the instruments.
RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the review inclusion criteria and 13 instruments were available for review. Most of the instruments did not address all knowledge components essential for CAUTI prevention as defined by the catheter lifecycle model. The psychometric quality of the instruments was not sufficiently evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS: Few instruments are available for CAUTI prevention knowledge measurement. The instruments were not closely aligned with the catheter lifecycle model as a framework. If CAUTI knowledge cannot be measured accurately using an effective instrument, this has the potential to impact negatively on clinical care and the focus of interventions. There is a need for a standardized instrument for the evaluation of CAUTI prevention knowledge so that targeted interventions can address knowledge deficits.