Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2020
Factors Associated With Attendance at a 1-yr Post-Cardiac Rehabilitation Risk Factor Check.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Giannoccaro Justin D, Aggarwal Sandeep, Grace Sherry L, Campbell Tavis S, Hauer Trina, Arena Ross, Rouleau Codie R
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) often fail to maintain secondary prevention gains after completing cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Follow-up appointments aimed at assessing cardiac status and encouraging maintenance of health behaviors after CR completion are generally offered but not well-attended. This study explored patient characteristics and barriers associated with nonattendance at a 1-yr follow-up visit following CR completion.
METHODS: Forty-five patients with CAD who completed a 12-wk outpatient CR program but did not attend the 1-yr follow-up appointment were included. Participants responded to a survey consisting of open-ended questions about follow-up attendance, a modified version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale, and self-report items regarding current health practices and perceived strength of recommendation to attend. Thematic analysis was used to derive categories from open-ended questionnaire responses. Linear regression was used to assess characteristics associated with appointment attendance barriers.
RESULTS: Barrier themes were as follows: (1) lack of awareness; (2) perception of appointment as unnecessary; (3) practical or scheduling issues; (4) comorbid health issues; and (5) anticipated an unpleasant experience at the appointment. Greater self-reported barriers (mean ± SD = 1.97/5.00 ± 0.57) were significantly associated with lower perceived strength of recommendation to attend the follow-up appointment (2.82/5.00 ± 1.45), P = .005.
CONCLUSIONS: Providing a stronger recommendation to attend, enhancing patient awareness, highlighting potential benefits, and supporting self-efficacy might increase 1-yr follow-up appointment attendance and, in turn, support long-term adherence to cardiovascular risk reduction behaviors.
METHODS: Forty-five patients with CAD who completed a 12-wk outpatient CR program but did not attend the 1-yr follow-up appointment were included. Participants responded to a survey consisting of open-ended questions about follow-up attendance, a modified version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale, and self-report items regarding current health practices and perceived strength of recommendation to attend. Thematic analysis was used to derive categories from open-ended questionnaire responses. Linear regression was used to assess characteristics associated with appointment attendance barriers.
RESULTS: Barrier themes were as follows: (1) lack of awareness; (2) perception of appointment as unnecessary; (3) practical or scheduling issues; (4) comorbid health issues; and (5) anticipated an unpleasant experience at the appointment. Greater self-reported barriers (mean ± SD = 1.97/5.00 ± 0.57) were significantly associated with lower perceived strength of recommendation to attend the follow-up appointment (2.82/5.00 ± 1.45), P = .005.
CONCLUSIONS: Providing a stronger recommendation to attend, enhancing patient awareness, highlighting potential benefits, and supporting self-efficacy might increase 1-yr follow-up appointment attendance and, in turn, support long-term adherence to cardiovascular risk reduction behaviors.