European journal of preventive cardiology · 2019
Home-based exercise with telemonitoring guidance in patients with coronary artery disease: Does it improve long-term physical fitness?
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Avila Andrea, Claes Jomme, Buys Roselien, Azzawi May, Vanhees Luc, Cornelissen Veronique
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Home-based interventions might facilitate the lifelong uptake of a physically active lifestyle following completion of a supervised phase II exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. Yet, data on the long-term effectiveness of home-based exercise training on physical activity and exercise capacity are scarce.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the TeleRehabilitation in Coronary Heart disease (TRiCH) study was to compare the long-term effects of a short home-based phase III exercise programme with telemonitoring guidance to a prolonged centre-based phase III programme in coronary artery disease patients. The primary outcome was exercise capacity. Secondary outcomes included physical activity behaviour, cardiovascular risk profile and health-related quality of life.
METHODS: Ninety coronary artery disease patients (80 men) were randomly assigned to 3 months of home-based (30), centre-based (30) or a control group (30) on a 1:1:1 basis after completion of their phase II ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation programme. Outcome measures were assessed at discharge of the phase II programme and after one year.
RESULTS: Eighty patients (72 (91%) men; mean age 62.6 years) completed the one-year follow-up measurements. Exercise capacity and secondary outcomes were preserved in all three groups (Ptime > 0.05 for all), irrespective of the intervention (Pinteraction > 0.05 for all). Eighty-five per cent of patients met the international guidelines for physical activity (Ptime < 0.05). No interaction effect was found for physical activity.
CONCLUSION: Overall, exercise capacity remained stable during one year following phase II cardiac rehabilitation. Our home-based exercise intervention was as effective as centre-based and did not result in higher levels of exercise capacity and physical activity compared to the other two interventions.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02047942. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02047942.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the TeleRehabilitation in Coronary Heart disease (TRiCH) study was to compare the long-term effects of a short home-based phase III exercise programme with telemonitoring guidance to a prolonged centre-based phase III programme in coronary artery disease patients. The primary outcome was exercise capacity. Secondary outcomes included physical activity behaviour, cardiovascular risk profile and health-related quality of life.
METHODS: Ninety coronary artery disease patients (80 men) were randomly assigned to 3 months of home-based (30), centre-based (30) or a control group (30) on a 1:1:1 basis after completion of their phase II ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation programme. Outcome measures were assessed at discharge of the phase II programme and after one year.
RESULTS: Eighty patients (72 (91%) men; mean age 62.6 years) completed the one-year follow-up measurements. Exercise capacity and secondary outcomes were preserved in all three groups (Ptime > 0.05 for all), irrespective of the intervention (Pinteraction > 0.05 for all). Eighty-five per cent of patients met the international guidelines for physical activity (Ptime < 0.05). No interaction effect was found for physical activity.
CONCLUSION: Overall, exercise capacity remained stable during one year following phase II cardiac rehabilitation. Our home-based exercise intervention was as effective as centre-based and did not result in higher levels of exercise capacity and physical activity compared to the other two interventions.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02047942. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02047942.