International journal of cardiology · 2019
High-intensity interval training for patients with coronary artery disease: Finding the optimal balance.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Keech Andrew, Holgate Katie, Fildes Jennifer, Indraratna Praveen, Cummins Leigh, Lewis Chaminda, Yu Jennifer
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The optimal characteristics of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) within cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are unclear. We assessed a HIIT protocol designed to balance patient safety, efficacy and enjoyment.
METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with CAD completed 6-weeks (× 2 sessions per week) of HIIT within outpatient (phase 2) CR. HIIT comprised 15 repetitions × 30-seconds cycling at ∼85-90% maximum heart rate, interspersed with 30-seconds of active recovery. Key outcomes covered patient safety, efficacy (peak aerobic capacity, body composition, blood pressure and vascular function), and patient adherence and enjoyment.
RESULTS: No cardiovascular-related adverse events were reported in relation to HIIT sessions. Patients showed significant improvement in peak aerobic capacity (mean +12%, p < 0.001, effect size d = 0.38), blood pressure (brachial systolic -7mmHg, p < 0.001, d = -0.59) and total body fat (-4%, p < 0.001, d = -0.49). Central adaptations were prominent (aortic systolic BP -5mmHg, p = 0.001, d = -0.50; visceral fat -10%, p = 0.001, d = -0.41). Patient enjoyment of training was high (5.5 out of 7 using the Exercise Enjoyment Scale) and measures of affective state improved following training (assorted p < 0.018).
CONCLUSIONS: This HIIT protocol appears safe, effective and enjoyable for patients with CAD within CR. Improved aerobic fitness, blood pressure and body fat levels were observed indicating improved cardiovascular-risk. High patient enjoyment and improved mood suggest the HIIT could be sustainable for patients in the longer-term.
METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with CAD completed 6-weeks (× 2 sessions per week) of HIIT within outpatient (phase 2) CR. HIIT comprised 15 repetitions × 30-seconds cycling at ∼85-90% maximum heart rate, interspersed with 30-seconds of active recovery. Key outcomes covered patient safety, efficacy (peak aerobic capacity, body composition, blood pressure and vascular function), and patient adherence and enjoyment.
RESULTS: No cardiovascular-related adverse events were reported in relation to HIIT sessions. Patients showed significant improvement in peak aerobic capacity (mean +12%, p < 0.001, effect size d = 0.38), blood pressure (brachial systolic -7mmHg, p < 0.001, d = -0.59) and total body fat (-4%, p < 0.001, d = -0.49). Central adaptations were prominent (aortic systolic BP -5mmHg, p = 0.001, d = -0.50; visceral fat -10%, p = 0.001, d = -0.41). Patient enjoyment of training was high (5.5 out of 7 using the Exercise Enjoyment Scale) and measures of affective state improved following training (assorted p < 0.018).
CONCLUSIONS: This HIIT protocol appears safe, effective and enjoyable for patients with CAD within CR. Improved aerobic fitness, blood pressure and body fat levels were observed indicating improved cardiovascular-risk. High patient enjoyment and improved mood suggest the HIIT could be sustainable for patients in the longer-term.