Nature of Cardiac Rehabilitation Around the Globe.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Supervia Marta, Turk-Adawi Karam, Lopez-Jimenez Francisco, Pesah Ella, Ding Rongjing, Britto Raquel R, Bjarnason-Wehrens Birna, Derman Wayne, Abreu Ana, Babu Abraham S, Santos Claudia Anchique, Jong Seng K, Cuenza Lucky, Yeo Tee Joo, Scantlebury Dawn, Andersen Karl, Gonzalez Graciela, Giga Vojislav, Vulic Dusko, Vataman Eleonora, Cliff Jacqueline, Kouidi Evangelia, Yagci Ilker, Kim Chul, Benaim Briseida, Estany Eduardo Rivas, Fernandez Rosalia, Radi Basuni, Gaita Dan, Simon Attila, Chen Ssu-Yuan, Roxburgh Brendon, Martin Juan Castillo, Maskhulia Lela, Burdiat Gerard, Salmon Richard, Lomelí Hermes, Sadeghi Masoumeh, Sovova Eliska, Hautala Arto, Tamuleviciute-Prasciene Egle, Ambrosetti Marco, Neubeck Lis, Asher Elad, Kemps Hareld, Eysymontt Zbigniew, Farsky Stefan, Hayward Jo, Prescott Eva, Dawkes Susan, Santibanez Claudio, Zeballos Cecilia, Pavy Bruno, Kiessling Anna, Sarrafzadegan Nizal, Baer Carolyn, Thomas Randal, Hu Dayi, Grace Sherry L
Аннотация
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a piloted survey was administered online to CR programs globally. Cardiac associations and local champions facilitated program identification. Quality (benchmark of ≥ 75% of programs in a given country meeting each of 20 indicators) was ranked. Results were compared by WHO region using generalized linear mixed models.
FINDINGS: 111/203 (54.7%) countries in the world offer CR; data were collected in 93 (83.8%; N = 1082 surveys, 32.1% program response rate). The most commonly-accepted indications were: myocardial infarction (n = 832, 97.4%), percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 820, 96.1%; 0.10), and coronary artery bypass surgery (n = 817, 95.8%). Most programs were led by physicians (n = 680; 69.1%). The most common CR providers (mean = 5.9 ± 2.8/program) were: nurses (n = 816, 88.1%; low in Africa, p < 0.001), dietitians (n = 739, 80.2%), and physiotherapists (n = 733, 79.3%). The most commonly-offered core components (mean = 8.7 ± 1.9 program) were: initial assessment (n = 939, 98.8%; most commonly for hypertension, tobacco, and physical inactivity), risk factor management (n = 928, 98.2%), patient education (n = 895, 96.9%), and exercise (n = 898, 94.3%; lower in Western Pacific, p < 0.01). All regions met ≥ 16/20 quality indicators, but quality was < 75% for tobacco cessation and return-to-work counseling (lower in Americas, p = < 0.05).
INTERPRETATION: This first-ever survey of CR around the globe suggests CR quality is high. However, there is significant regional variation, which could impact patient outcomes.