Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2004
Relationship between contraction stress and degree of conversion in restorative composites.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Calheiros Fernanda C, Braga Roberto R, Kawano Yoshio, Ballester Rafael Y
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To verify the relationship between contraction stress and degree of conversion (DC) in different composites (Filtek Z250, Filtek A110, Tetric Ceram and Heliomolar).
METHODS: For the contraction stress test, composite (2 mm thick) was applied between two 5-mm diameter glass rods, mounted in a tensilometer. DC was determined by Infrared Photoacoustic spectroscopy in specimens with similar dimensions and geometry, submitted to identical curing conditions. Specimens were exposed to different energy densities (4.5, 13.5, 27.0, 54.0 and 108.0 J/cm2) by varying exposure time. Contraction stress and DC were recorded 10 min after the beginning of photoactivation. Results were analyzed by ANOVA/Tukey's test and regression analysis.
RESULTS: For contraction stress, the interaction between composite and energy density was significant. Stress values ranged between 0.6+/-0.2 and 2.0+/-0.3 MPa at 4.5 J/cm2, 2.3+/-0.5 and 4.3+/-0.4 MPa at 13.5 J/cm2, 3.8+/-0.5 and 5.8+/-0.9 MPa at 27.0 J/cm2, 4.2+/-0.8 and 7.9+/-0.9 MPa at 54.0 J/cm2 and 6.6+/-0.8 and 8.1+/-0.9 MPa at 108.0 J/cm2. Tetric Ceram (39+/-5.8%) showed a higher average DC than the other materials. Heliomolar (28+/-5.2%) showed an average DC similar to Filtek Z250 (32+/-6.6%) and to Filtek A110 (24+/-7.5%) regardless of the energy density level. No significant increase in DC was observed above 27 J/cm2.
CONCLUSIONS: At high energy levels, DC had a tendency to level off earlier than contraction stress values.
SIGNIFICANCE: Using high energy densities may cause a significant increase in stress values, without producing a significant increase in conversion.
METHODS: For the contraction stress test, composite (2 mm thick) was applied between two 5-mm diameter glass rods, mounted in a tensilometer. DC was determined by Infrared Photoacoustic spectroscopy in specimens with similar dimensions and geometry, submitted to identical curing conditions. Specimens were exposed to different energy densities (4.5, 13.5, 27.0, 54.0 and 108.0 J/cm2) by varying exposure time. Contraction stress and DC were recorded 10 min after the beginning of photoactivation. Results were analyzed by ANOVA/Tukey's test and regression analysis.
RESULTS: For contraction stress, the interaction between composite and energy density was significant. Stress values ranged between 0.6+/-0.2 and 2.0+/-0.3 MPa at 4.5 J/cm2, 2.3+/-0.5 and 4.3+/-0.4 MPa at 13.5 J/cm2, 3.8+/-0.5 and 5.8+/-0.9 MPa at 27.0 J/cm2, 4.2+/-0.8 and 7.9+/-0.9 MPa at 54.0 J/cm2 and 6.6+/-0.8 and 8.1+/-0.9 MPa at 108.0 J/cm2. Tetric Ceram (39+/-5.8%) showed a higher average DC than the other materials. Heliomolar (28+/-5.2%) showed an average DC similar to Filtek Z250 (32+/-6.6%) and to Filtek A110 (24+/-7.5%) regardless of the energy density level. No significant increase in DC was observed above 27 J/cm2.
CONCLUSIONS: At high energy levels, DC had a tendency to level off earlier than contraction stress values.
SIGNIFICANCE: Using high energy densities may cause a significant increase in stress values, without producing a significant increase in conversion.