The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2017
Health Care Use and Associated Time and Out of Pocket Expenditures for Patients With Cardiovascular Disease in a Publicly Funded Health Care System.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ali Saba, Moghei Mahshid, Krahn Murray, Chessex Caroline, Grace Sherry L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to describe (1) health care use and associated patient time and out of pocket (OOP) costs over 2 years after a cardiac diagnosis, (2) the sociodemographic and clinical drivers of these costs, and (3) patient costs related to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participation.
METHODS: Secondary analysis was conducted in an observational prospective CR program evaluation cohort in Ontario, which has a publicly funded health care system. A convenience sample of patients from 1 of 3 CR programs was approached at the first visit, and consenting participants completed a survey. Participants were e-mailed surveys again 6 months and 1 and 2 years later; these later surveys assessed their cardiac care and medications and the time and OOP costs associated with care visits. Patient time was valued based on average wages in Ontario.
RESULTS: Of 411 consenting patients, 240 (58.3%) completed CR, and 192 (46.7%) were retained at 2 years. Patients most often visited a general practitioner and had electrocardiography and treatment for angina. The total cost to patients over 2 years was CAD$73.70 ± $275.84 for time and $377.01 ± $321.72 for OOP costs ($525.93 ± $467.08 overall). With adjustment, there were significantly higher OOP costs for women (P < 0.001) and less educated (P < 0.001) patients. Participants spent considerable money that was relatively OOP on CR visits alone ($384.78 ± $269.67), with time costs at $379.07 ± $1035.49 ($939.43 ± $1333.29 overall; 1.6% share of 1 year's income).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, time and OOP costs are modest for patients with cardiac conditions, except for CR. Alternative delivery models are needed, in particular for low-income patients.
METHODS: Secondary analysis was conducted in an observational prospective CR program evaluation cohort in Ontario, which has a publicly funded health care system. A convenience sample of patients from 1 of 3 CR programs was approached at the first visit, and consenting participants completed a survey. Participants were e-mailed surveys again 6 months and 1 and 2 years later; these later surveys assessed their cardiac care and medications and the time and OOP costs associated with care visits. Patient time was valued based on average wages in Ontario.
RESULTS: Of 411 consenting patients, 240 (58.3%) completed CR, and 192 (46.7%) were retained at 2 years. Patients most often visited a general practitioner and had electrocardiography and treatment for angina. The total cost to patients over 2 years was CAD$73.70 ± $275.84 for time and $377.01 ± $321.72 for OOP costs ($525.93 ± $467.08 overall). With adjustment, there were significantly higher OOP costs for women (P < 0.001) and less educated (P < 0.001) patients. Participants spent considerable money that was relatively OOP on CR visits alone ($384.78 ± $269.67), with time costs at $379.07 ± $1035.49 ($939.43 ± $1333.29 overall; 1.6% share of 1 year's income).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, time and OOP costs are modest for patients with cardiac conditions, except for CR. Alternative delivery models are needed, in particular for low-income patients.