Journal of psychosomatic research · 2016
Validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale in Type 2 diabetes.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carter Jasmine, Cogo-Moreira Hugo, Herrmann Nathan, Merino Daniel, Yang Pearl, Shah Baiju R, Kiss Alex, Reitav Jaan, Oh Paul I, Swardfager Walter
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Depressive symptoms are common among people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to validate the 3-factor structure of the 14-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale proposed by Carleton et al. (2013) in a T2DM population.
METHODS: The CES-D was administered to consecutive patients with T2DM entering a rehabilitation program. Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Subscale viability, differential item functioning, and associations with clinical characteristics were tested in bifactor models.
RESULTS: Among adults with T2DM (n=305, age 56.9±11.1, 44.9% male, duration of diabetes 7.8±7.9years, HbA1c 0.076±0.014%), the construct validity of Carleton's 3-factor solution (negative affective, positive affective and somatic symptoms) was confirmed, although negative affective and somatic symptoms were highly correlated (r=0.926). The CES-D items can be summed to arrive at a total score (ωH=0.869), but not subscale scores (ωS>0.7). Differential item functioning was not found based on age or body mass index (BMI), but Item 1 ("I was bothered by things that don't usually bother me") was inflated in women and Item 7 ("I felt that everything I did was an effort") was inflated in those with higher glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). The general depression factor decreased with age (β=-0.247, p<0.001) and increased with BMI (β=0.102, p=0.041) but not HbA1c (β=0.065, p=0.461). Negative affective symptoms (β=0.743, p=0.001), but not other depressive symptoms, were higher in women.
CONCLUSIONS: The 14-item CES-D retained construct validity in adults with T2DM. Depressive symptoms were associated with younger age, female gender and BMI, but not with glycemic control.
METHODS: The CES-D was administered to consecutive patients with T2DM entering a rehabilitation program. Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. Subscale viability, differential item functioning, and associations with clinical characteristics were tested in bifactor models.
RESULTS: Among adults with T2DM (n=305, age 56.9±11.1, 44.9% male, duration of diabetes 7.8±7.9years, HbA1c 0.076±0.014%), the construct validity of Carleton's 3-factor solution (negative affective, positive affective and somatic symptoms) was confirmed, although negative affective and somatic symptoms were highly correlated (r=0.926). The CES-D items can be summed to arrive at a total score (ωH=0.869), but not subscale scores (ωS>0.7). Differential item functioning was not found based on age or body mass index (BMI), but Item 1 ("I was bothered by things that don't usually bother me") was inflated in women and Item 7 ("I felt that everything I did was an effort") was inflated in those with higher glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). The general depression factor decreased with age (β=-0.247, p<0.001) and increased with BMI (β=0.102, p=0.041) but not HbA1c (β=0.065, p=0.461). Negative affective symptoms (β=0.743, p=0.001), but not other depressive symptoms, were higher in women.
CONCLUSIONS: The 14-item CES-D retained construct validity in adults with T2DM. Depressive symptoms were associated with younger age, female gender and BMI, but not with glycemic control.