Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2015
Six-Minute Walk Test Distances in Fast-Track and Traditional Cardiac Rehabilitation: A 3-YEAR DATABASE REVIEW.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bellet R Nicole, Francis Rebecca L, Adams Lewis, Morris Norman R
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Home-based and center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) have demonstrated similar levels of risk factor reduction. Cardiac rehabilitation models with fewer exercise sessions may be as effective as traditional models. This study reviewed a community phase II CR database from 2007 to 2010.
METHODS: A fast-track CR (FTCR) group was introduced alongside an existing traditional CR (TCR) program. The 2 programs ran concurrently on different days. Both FTCR and TCR treatment groups undertook supervised low to moderate intensity exercise training for 6 weeks and were provided with home exercise advice. Fast-track CR included once-weekly exercise sessions and a 1-time 7-hour education session; TCR included twice-weekly exercise and education sessions. Similar education was provided in both programs. Six-minute walk test distance (6MWD) was assessed pre-CR and post-CR for both groups.
RESULTS: Six hundred and twenty patients enrolled in CR during the period, and patients elected or were assigned (not randomized) to FTCR (n = 197) or to TCR (n = 423) treatment groups. Complete 6MWD data sets were available for 115 FTCR and 254 TCR subjects. Repeated-measures analysis of variance found 6MWD outcomes to be similar for both groups over both assessments combined and at each assessment point. Improvements in 6MWD post-CR were different for men and women in the CR database (8% vs 5%, respectively, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Six-minute walk test distance outcomes were not different for subjects undergoing once-weekly or twice-weekly supervised CR exercise sessions. CR models with fewer supervised exercise sessions may provide similar functional outcomes to traditional CR models.
METHODS: A fast-track CR (FTCR) group was introduced alongside an existing traditional CR (TCR) program. The 2 programs ran concurrently on different days. Both FTCR and TCR treatment groups undertook supervised low to moderate intensity exercise training for 6 weeks and were provided with home exercise advice. Fast-track CR included once-weekly exercise sessions and a 1-time 7-hour education session; TCR included twice-weekly exercise and education sessions. Similar education was provided in both programs. Six-minute walk test distance (6MWD) was assessed pre-CR and post-CR for both groups.
RESULTS: Six hundred and twenty patients enrolled in CR during the period, and patients elected or were assigned (not randomized) to FTCR (n = 197) or to TCR (n = 423) treatment groups. Complete 6MWD data sets were available for 115 FTCR and 254 TCR subjects. Repeated-measures analysis of variance found 6MWD outcomes to be similar for both groups over both assessments combined and at each assessment point. Improvements in 6MWD post-CR were different for men and women in the CR database (8% vs 5%, respectively, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Six-minute walk test distance outcomes were not different for subjects undergoing once-weekly or twice-weekly supervised CR exercise sessions. CR models with fewer supervised exercise sessions may provide similar functional outcomes to traditional CR models.