Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation · 2026
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Turkish Low Back Pain Knowledge Questionnaire (LKQ-Tr).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aygun-Polat Elif, Yuksel Fuat, Polat Yusuf
Аннотация
BackgroundKnowledge about low back pain (LBP) may influence disability, beliefs, and self-management, but no validated Turkish instrument is available to assess this construct.ObjectiveTo translate, cross-culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Low Back Pain Knowledge Questionnaire in adults with LBP.MethodsThe questionnaire was translated and cross-culturally adapted using established procedures. The pre-final version was pilot tested in 30 adults with LBP. Psychometric testing was performed in 186 adults, and 25 participants completed the questionnaire again after 7 to 14 days. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, structural validity, construct validity, and floor and ceiling effects were examined.ResultsThe Turkish version showed high internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.896, and good test-retest reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.871. Structural validity supported the original three-factor structure and showed acceptable model fit. All predefined hypotheses were confirmed. Higher knowledge scores were associated with lower disability, more positive back beliefs, younger age, higher education level, and being a health professional. No floor or ceiling effects were observed.ConclusionThe Turkish version of the Low Back Pain Knowledge Questionnaire showed evidence of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, structural validity, and construct validity in Turkish-speaking adults with LBP. It may be a useful instrument for assessing LBP-related knowledge in clinical and research settings. Further studies in more diverse populations and evaluation of responsiveness are warranted.