Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2026
A randomized controlled trial of regulation-focused psychotherapy for children with externalizing disorders.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Halfon Sibel, Albayrak Melike, Körlü Bulut Maide, Eğrilmez Duru, Gülzari Edlin, Arikan Kübra, Büyükaşik Can J, Hoffman Leon, Kufferath-Lin Tatianna, Prout Tracy A, Rice Timothy
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy of Regulation-Focused Psychotherapy for Children (RFP-C), a manualized time-limited psychodynamic treatment for externalizing disorders targeting implicit emotion regulation.
METHOD: Eighty Turkish children (Mage = 8.53 years, 71.25% male) with externalizing disorders were randomized to RFP-C or an active control, a parenting and child social skills group (PSSG). Primary outcomes were externalizing and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) problems. Secondary outcomes were child-reported problems, global functioning, child and parent emotion regulation, and parenting stress. Assessments occurred at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment (primary endpoint), and 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: RFP-C was superior to PSSG in reducing broad externalizing problems at post-treatment with a small-to-moderate effect (d = -.47, 97.5% CI [-.87, -.07]). This effect attenuated (d = -.34, 97.5% CI [-.75, .06]) and was no longer significant at follow-up. No significant treatment effects emerged for ODD symptoms. RFP-C was also superior for child global functioning (d = .57, 95% CI [.30, .84]) and parenting stress (d = -.36, 95% CI [-.70, -.02]) at post-treatment, with the latter no longer significant at follow-up. No other between-group differences were significant.
CONCLUSION: RFP-C showed superior effects in reducing broad externalizing problems at post-treatment; however, further research should clarify its effects on ODD symptoms and the durability of treatment gains.
METHOD: Eighty Turkish children (Mage = 8.53 years, 71.25% male) with externalizing disorders were randomized to RFP-C or an active control, a parenting and child social skills group (PSSG). Primary outcomes were externalizing and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) problems. Secondary outcomes were child-reported problems, global functioning, child and parent emotion regulation, and parenting stress. Assessments occurred at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment (primary endpoint), and 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: RFP-C was superior to PSSG in reducing broad externalizing problems at post-treatment with a small-to-moderate effect (d = -.47, 97.5% CI [-.87, -.07]). This effect attenuated (d = -.34, 97.5% CI [-.75, .06]) and was no longer significant at follow-up. No significant treatment effects emerged for ODD symptoms. RFP-C was also superior for child global functioning (d = .57, 95% CI [.30, .84]) and parenting stress (d = -.36, 95% CI [-.70, -.02]) at post-treatment, with the latter no longer significant at follow-up. No other between-group differences were significant.
CONCLUSION: RFP-C showed superior effects in reducing broad externalizing problems at post-treatment; however, further research should clarify its effects on ODD symptoms and the durability of treatment gains.