MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/02698811261478603

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2026

A randomized crossover trial comparing the acute physiological and psychological effects of botanical formulations of oral psilocybin, oral psilocin, and sublingual psilocin.

Tai Marlene L, Szigeti Balázs, Downey Amanda E, Aday Jacob S, Fredenburg Lisa, Sakai Kimberly, Molina Cesar, Fernandes-Osterhold Gisele, Bradley Ellen R, Pantoni Maddie, Moss Ryan, Lightburn Benjamin, Plessow Franziska, O'Donovan Aoife, Woolley Josh D

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Psilocybin, a serotonergic psychedelic found in hallucinogenic mushrooms, is metabolized to psilocin, the compound responsible for its psychoactive effects. Psilocybin has demonstrated therapeutic potential for neuropsychiatric conditions. While recent trials have primarily used orally administered synthetic psilocybin, alternative formulations and delivery methods may offer therapeutic advantages, yet the effects of these approaches remain poorly characterized.

AIMS: To compare the pharmacodynamic profiles and tolerability of oral psilocybin, oral psilocin, and sublingual psilocin derived from whole-mushroom extracts in healthy adults.

METHODS

In this randomized, within-subject, crossover trial, 20 healthy adults (10 men, 10 women; mean age 40.1 ± 5.9 years) completed up to four drug administration sessions involving botanical oral psilocybin (25 mg), oral psilocin (17.5 mg), or sublingual psilocin (2.18, 4.36, or 8 mg). All sessions included therapeutic support and pre- and post-dose psychotherapy. Acute effects were assessed using vital signs and subjective ratings of drug intensity and psychedelic experience.

RESULTS

Oral psilocin produced a similar temporal and subjective profile to oral psilocybin, with a lower burden of adverse effects. Sublingual psilocin was well tolerated, though the apparently lower achieved drug exposure limited comparability to oral administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral psilocin may offer tolerability advantages over oral psilocybin. Sublingual psilocin was well tolerated at the dosages tested. Further studies are needed to evaluate botanical formulations and optimize delivery approaches.Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05317689.

Для цитирования: Tai Marlene L, Szigeti Balázs, Downey Amanda E, Aday Jacob S, Fredenburg Lisa, Sakai Kimberly, Molina Cesar, Fernandes-Osterhold Gisele, Bradley Ellen R, Pantoni Maddie, Moss Ryan, Lightburn Benjamin, Plessow Franziska, O'Donovan Aoife, Woolley Josh D. A randomized crossover trial comparing the acute physiological and psychological effects of botanical formulations of oral psilocybin, oral psilocin, and sublingual psilocin.. Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England). 2026. DOI: 10.1177/02698811261478603.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.