Klinische Padiatrie · 2026
Measuring Participation in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Spiess Karoline, Fornefeld Dustin, Duran Ibrahim, Schönau Eckhard, Gross Stephanie, Steven Stefanie, Fricke Oliver
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and its child and youth version provide a holistic view of health problems and describe health status at five different levels. Some levels have measurement methods that can be used to visualise the success of therapy. However, this is questionable for the level of participation. The aim of this review is to determine whether there are any valid measurement methods for assessing participation in health care intervention for children and adolescents according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. The search query was created according to the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study Design scheme and used in two search runs across five databases (PubMED, Cochrane Database, NeuroBITE, APA PsychNET and PEDro). Publications were included or excluded by three reviewers based on defined criteria. The included publications were evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 tool and the study and measurement characteristics and measurement properties in terms of validity and reliability were presented. This systematic review is listed in PROSPERO.
RESULTS: A total of four publications were included, describing 23 measurement methods. With regard to validity, there are indications of adequate content and construct validity, as well as adequate to the questionable criterion and structural validity.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement methods for assessing participation in health care interventions according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for children and adolescents exist. There is evidence of validity, but the quality of the studies is low.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. The search query was created according to the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study Design scheme and used in two search runs across five databases (PubMED, Cochrane Database, NeuroBITE, APA PsychNET and PEDro). Publications were included or excluded by three reviewers based on defined criteria. The included publications were evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 tool and the study and measurement characteristics and measurement properties in terms of validity and reliability were presented. This systematic review is listed in PROSPERO.
RESULTS: A total of four publications were included, describing 23 measurement methods. With regard to validity, there are indications of adequate content and construct validity, as well as adequate to the questionable criterion and structural validity.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement methods for assessing participation in health care interventions according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for children and adolescents exist. There is evidence of validity, but the quality of the studies is low.