Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
The Emerging Roles of AI in Self-Directed Stress Management: Systematic Review.
Систематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Reyes Mary Kamillah Grace, Teo Shauna Sha Min, Hartanto Andree
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Stress is widespread and carries substantial mental health, social, and economic burdens. Yet, access to clinician-led stress management remains constrained by service capacity, cost, and stigma. In response, artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled tools have rapidly proliferated as scalable, self-directed options. However, evidence on how these systems support stress management outside formal clinical settings remains fragmented.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to synthesize empirical evidence on how AI-enabled technologies are used for self-directed stress management. We mapped the emerging functions of these tools, the psychological frameworks informing their design, the populations and settings studied, and the outcomes reported.
METHODS: We conducted a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-compliant systematic review of English-language studies published between 2000 and 2025. Six databases were searched (APA PsycINFO, PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, ProQuest, and Google Scholar).
RESULTS: Of 3008 records identified, 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of included studies was critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (version 2018). Findings illustrated that AI-supported stress management can operate through 5 core functions, including psychological intervention, behavioral support, psychoeducation, companionship, and emotional support, and stress monitoring, detection, and triage. Across the reviewed studies, these functions supported self-directed stress management by helping users identify stress, regulate responses, and engage in coping outside formal clinical care.
CONCLUSIONS: AI-enabled systems show preliminary promise for supporting self-directed stress management through multiple user-facing functions grounded in established psychological frameworks.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to synthesize empirical evidence on how AI-enabled technologies are used for self-directed stress management. We mapped the emerging functions of these tools, the psychological frameworks informing their design, the populations and settings studied, and the outcomes reported.
METHODS: We conducted a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-compliant systematic review of English-language studies published between 2000 and 2025. Six databases were searched (APA PsycINFO, PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, ProQuest, and Google Scholar).
RESULTS: Of 3008 records identified, 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of included studies was critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (version 2018). Findings illustrated that AI-supported stress management can operate through 5 core functions, including psychological intervention, behavioral support, psychoeducation, companionship, and emotional support, and stress monitoring, detection, and triage. Across the reviewed studies, these functions supported self-directed stress management by helping users identify stress, regulate responses, and engage in coping outside formal clinical care.
CONCLUSIONS: AI-enabled systems show preliminary promise for supporting self-directed stress management through multiple user-facing functions grounded in established psychological frameworks.