Psychiatrische Praxis · 2026
[When IPS Coaching isn't always effective: Findings from the German IPS-ZIB Project].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bergdolt Juliane, Dehn Lorenz B, Schreiter Julia, Hubert Stella, Jenderny Sarah, Driessen Martin, Steinhart Ingmar
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The project "IPS-Coaching - Back to Work" (IPS-ZIB) examined whether IPS coaching improves (re)integration into work compared to standard care.
METHODS: A prospective, non-randomized, controlled, bicentric study conducted over two years with 244 participants (IPS: n=150; control group/CG: n=94) with affective (90%) or psychotic disorders.
RESULTS: There were no sign. differences between IPS (62%) and VG (64%) in terms of re-employment, applications for disability pension and sheltered workshop, days until to job (re)entry or the duration of employment. Having an existing employment contract at the start of the study was generally associated with a higher integration rate.
CONCLUSIONS: IPS did not show superiority over standard care. The high integration rate in both groups suggests generally favorable employment conditions in this specific sample and possibly special study conditions. Individuals without employment contracts require targeted support.
METHODS: A prospective, non-randomized, controlled, bicentric study conducted over two years with 244 participants (IPS: n=150; control group/CG: n=94) with affective (90%) or psychotic disorders.
RESULTS: There were no sign. differences between IPS (62%) and VG (64%) in terms of re-employment, applications for disability pension and sheltered workshop, days until to job (re)entry or the duration of employment. Having an existing employment contract at the start of the study was generally associated with a higher integration rate.
CONCLUSIONS: IPS did not show superiority over standard care. The high integration rate in both groups suggests generally favorable employment conditions in this specific sample and possibly special study conditions. Individuals without employment contracts require targeted support.