Psychiatrische Praxis · 2026
[Flatter Hierarchies and Enhanced Communication: Perceptions of Interprofessional Collaboration in Community-Based Psychiatric Teams].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hünninghaus Marcel, Claus Sylvia, Auert Gudrun, Frisch Stefan, Stratmann Günther, Fernandez Andres
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in the perception of interprofessional collaboration between outreach-based and non-outreach-based staff in a § 64b SGB V model project psychiatric hospital.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using single items and the GreiFMIE for accessing opinions towards interprofessional collaboration. Group comparisons were performed exploratively using MWU tests.
RESULTS: Outreach-based staff reported higher values in team atmosphere, collaboration within teams and with external partners, attitudes toward other professional groups, perceived flatter hierarchies, and fewer barriers to interprofessional collaboration, while scores for relevance of interprofessional techniques, communication, and teamwork were comparable between groups.
CONCLUSION: Staff perceived the structural conditions of outreach-based settings more favorably. Further studies are required to explore the underlying mechanisms of these differences.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using single items and the GreiFMIE for accessing opinions towards interprofessional collaboration. Group comparisons were performed exploratively using MWU tests.
RESULTS: Outreach-based staff reported higher values in team atmosphere, collaboration within teams and with external partners, attitudes toward other professional groups, perceived flatter hierarchies, and fewer barriers to interprofessional collaboration, while scores for relevance of interprofessional techniques, communication, and teamwork were comparable between groups.
CONCLUSION: Staff perceived the structural conditions of outreach-based settings more favorably. Further studies are required to explore the underlying mechanisms of these differences.