Epilepsia · 2026
A translational multimodal machine-learning prototype predicting valproate response in epilepsy treatment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Platte Simeon, Kumar Afsheen, Guerini Giorgia, Pandolfo Massimo, Haslinger Denise, Josephson Colin B, Delgado-García Guillermo, Kaur Navprabhjot, Lux Michaela-Pauline, Stempfle Heiko, Depondt Chantal, Kälviäinen Reetta, Rosenow Felix, von Brauchitsch Sophie, Klein Karl Martin, Chiocchetti Andreas G
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy affects ~1% of the global population and often requires lifelong antiseizure medication (ASM) therapy. Valproic acid (VPA) is a commonly prescribed first-line ASM, yet only approximately half of patients achieve sustained seizure freedom. Treatment selection remains largely empirical. We aimed to develop and independently validate a multimodal predictive model to estimate response to VPA and support more individualized treatment strategies.
METHODS: This cross-sectional treatment response modeling study used data from a subset of the international Epi25 cohort (Belgium, Finland, Germany). Individuals with epilepsy were included if they had received VPA monotherapy and had available genetic or clinical data. Discovery data (1965-2021, 58% female) were split into a training set (n = 196) and test set (n = 133). Independent validation was performed in a Canadian cohort (2021-2022, n = 156, 40% female). The primary outcome was binary VPA response. Responders achieved ≥12 months of seizure freedom attributed to VPA; nonresponders had >50% seizure recurrence or discontinued VPA due to inefficacy, adverse effects, or unclear reasons. The predictive algorithm integrated features derived from common and rare variants in VPA pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genes, in vitro neuronal VPA response measures, and clinical features. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, predictive values (negative predictive value [NPV]/positive predictive value [PPV]), and area under the curve (AUC).
RESULTS: In the independent validation cohort, the multimodal classifier achieved a balanced accuracy of 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 52%-73%), NPV of 70% (95% CI = 51%-85%), PPV of 60% (95% CI = 46%-72%), and AUC of .73 (95% CI = .63-.83). Models restricted to single or dual data modalities showed consistently lower predictive performance.
SIGNIFICANCE: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that integrating genetic, cellular, and clinical data enables prediction of VPA treatment response with clinically meaningful accuracy. Although not yet ready for clinical application, this approach supports the feasibility of biomarker-informed ASM selection and may ultimately reduce time to effective seizure control.
METHODS: This cross-sectional treatment response modeling study used data from a subset of the international Epi25 cohort (Belgium, Finland, Germany). Individuals with epilepsy were included if they had received VPA monotherapy and had available genetic or clinical data. Discovery data (1965-2021, 58% female) were split into a training set (n = 196) and test set (n = 133). Independent validation was performed in a Canadian cohort (2021-2022, n = 156, 40% female). The primary outcome was binary VPA response. Responders achieved ≥12 months of seizure freedom attributed to VPA; nonresponders had >50% seizure recurrence or discontinued VPA due to inefficacy, adverse effects, or unclear reasons. The predictive algorithm integrated features derived from common and rare variants in VPA pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genes, in vitro neuronal VPA response measures, and clinical features. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, predictive values (negative predictive value [NPV]/positive predictive value [PPV]), and area under the curve (AUC).
RESULTS: In the independent validation cohort, the multimodal classifier achieved a balanced accuracy of 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 52%-73%), NPV of 70% (95% CI = 51%-85%), PPV of 60% (95% CI = 46%-72%), and AUC of .73 (95% CI = .63-.83). Models restricted to single or dual data modalities showed consistently lower predictive performance.
SIGNIFICANCE: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that integrating genetic, cellular, and clinical data enables prediction of VPA treatment response with clinically meaningful accuracy. Although not yet ready for clinical application, this approach supports the feasibility of biomarker-informed ASM selection and may ultimately reduce time to effective seizure control.