Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2026
Mentalization-based-treatment techniques across psychodynamic, cognitive and MBT therapies.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Colli Antonello, Gullo Salvatore, Gagliardini Giulia, Pandolfi Guia, Bateman Anthony, Fonagy Peter
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether therapists from orientations that do not explicitly target mentalizing-namely psychodynamic therapy (PDT) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-use interventions consistent with Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT), and how their use compares with MBT-oriented therapy.
METHODS: Seventy-five verbatim transcripts were randomly selected from audio-recorded psychotherapy sessions involving patients with personality disorders or subclinical personality difficulties. Therapist orientation was determined by self-identification (MBT = 25, CBT = 25, PDT = 25). Sessions were independently rated using the MBT Adherence and Competence Scale (MBT-ACS) and the Reflective Functioning (RF) Scale.
RESULTS: MBT-consistent techniques were observed in PDT and CBT sessions, though at lower levels than in MBT. MBT therapists showed higher MBT-ACS scores, particularly in maintaining a not-knowing stance and identifying non-mentalizing modes. Across orientations, higher MBT-ACS scores were associated with lower mean session-level RF, but also with greater within-session RF increases.
CONCLUSION: Mentalizing-oriented techniques appear across therapeutic orientations and may represent trans-theoretical process elements. Their association with both lower average RF and greater within-session change suggests they may be more frequently used in clinically challenging moments, supporting the restoration or enhancement of mentalizing.
METHODS: Seventy-five verbatim transcripts were randomly selected from audio-recorded psychotherapy sessions involving patients with personality disorders or subclinical personality difficulties. Therapist orientation was determined by self-identification (MBT = 25, CBT = 25, PDT = 25). Sessions were independently rated using the MBT Adherence and Competence Scale (MBT-ACS) and the Reflective Functioning (RF) Scale.
RESULTS: MBT-consistent techniques were observed in PDT and CBT sessions, though at lower levels than in MBT. MBT therapists showed higher MBT-ACS scores, particularly in maintaining a not-knowing stance and identifying non-mentalizing modes. Across orientations, higher MBT-ACS scores were associated with lower mean session-level RF, but also with greater within-session RF increases.
CONCLUSION: Mentalizing-oriented techniques appear across therapeutic orientations and may represent trans-theoretical process elements. Their association with both lower average RF and greater within-session change suggests they may be more frequently used in clinically challenging moments, supporting the restoration or enhancement of mentalizing.