Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026
Qualitative content analysis of reactivity effects and feasibility of ecological momentary assessments of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors in the long-term and in suicidal crises.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Spangenberg Lena, Spahn Cora, Serebriakova Jana, Forkmann Thomas, Glaesmer Heide
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study explored participant experiences with ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in the context of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs).
METHODS: 16 participants of a long-term EMA study (with varying STB occurrence during the study and low vs. high compliance) were interviewed on reactivity effects and feasibility of EMA. Qualitative content analysis was performed using an inductive-deductive approach and consensual coding.
RESULTS: Reactivity to EMA was reported by some participants, with suicidal thoughts occasionally intensifying/being triggered by survey prompts. Importantly, no evidence indicated that EMA triggered suicidal actions. However, the burden increased over time for some, calling for more personalized monitoring durations. EMA's feasibility during acute suicidal crises was questioned due to reduced ability and willingness to respond.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term EMA monitoring after psychiatric discharge was perceived as feasible and beneficial. Selection bias and the lack of quantitative validation limit generalizability. Findings underscore the value of mixed-methods approaches and participatory protocol design.
METHODS: 16 participants of a long-term EMA study (with varying STB occurrence during the study and low vs. high compliance) were interviewed on reactivity effects and feasibility of EMA. Qualitative content analysis was performed using an inductive-deductive approach and consensual coding.
RESULTS: Reactivity to EMA was reported by some participants, with suicidal thoughts occasionally intensifying/being triggered by survey prompts. Importantly, no evidence indicated that EMA triggered suicidal actions. However, the burden increased over time for some, calling for more personalized monitoring durations. EMA's feasibility during acute suicidal crises was questioned due to reduced ability and willingness to respond.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term EMA monitoring after psychiatric discharge was perceived as feasible and beneficial. Selection bias and the lack of quantitative validation limit generalizability. Findings underscore the value of mixed-methods approaches and participatory protocol design.