Journal of psychiatric research · 2026
A systematic review identifying personally modifiable factors for self-harm recovery in young people and the barriers and facilitators to their implementation.
СтатьяСистематический обзорПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McEvoy David, Sweeney Colm, Ryan Leona, Wilson Caroline, Healy Colm, Mongan David, Sheaf Greg, Higgins Agnes, Gallant Allyson J, Doyle Louise, Darker Catherine D, Keogh Brian, Kartalova-O'Doherty Yulia, Murphy Rebecca, Fitzgerald Christine, Staines Lorna, Lyne John Paul, O'Connor Karen, Anand-Vembar Shaakya, O'Keeffe Donal, Nic Aodha Caoimhe, Cannon Mary, Donohoe Gary, Longe Olivia, McDonald Colm, Burke Sara, Breen Oisin, Thomas Robyn, Doody Michelle, Cotter David
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: While research has extensively examined self-harm prevention and risk factors, fewer studies have explored recovery processes. Personally modifiable factors - lifestyle, skill-based, or behavioural aspects an individual can influence - may support self-harm recovery. This review aimed to identify these factors for young people and, secondarily, the barriers and facilitators affecting their implementation.
METHODS: Recovery was defined symptomatically (reduction or cessation of self-harm) and personally, using the CHIME framework (Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning, Empowerment). Five databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Embase, Web of Science) were searched in February 2025. Inductive coding identified personally modifiable factors, and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided analysis of barriers and facilitators.
RESULTS: From 16,900 screened records, 35 studies were included. Common factors for symptom-based recovery (ceasing self-harm) included activities or hobbies (such as exercise, art, or music), social engagement with friends/family, harm minimisation techniques (e.g., holding ice cubes, elastic bands), and distraction methods. Online engagement and harm minimisation were double-edged, offering support but sometimes posing risks. Online forums fostered connectedness and empowerment, and recovery stories promoted hope (i.e. personal recovery). Barriers and facilitators varied; stigma often hindered offline discussion but encouraged anonymous online support.
CONCLUSIONS: Young people identify diverse, personally modifiable factors that guide self-harm recovery alone or with support. These factors are context- and person-dependent, underscoring the need for flexible, individualized approaches. Future research should also include low- and middle-income countries and include stratified analyses by sex and gender to capture a broader range of experiences and recovery pathways.
METHODS: Recovery was defined symptomatically (reduction or cessation of self-harm) and personally, using the CHIME framework (Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning, Empowerment). Five databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Embase, Web of Science) were searched in February 2025. Inductive coding identified personally modifiable factors, and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided analysis of barriers and facilitators.
RESULTS: From 16,900 screened records, 35 studies were included. Common factors for symptom-based recovery (ceasing self-harm) included activities or hobbies (such as exercise, art, or music), social engagement with friends/family, harm minimisation techniques (e.g., holding ice cubes, elastic bands), and distraction methods. Online engagement and harm minimisation were double-edged, offering support but sometimes posing risks. Online forums fostered connectedness and empowerment, and recovery stories promoted hope (i.e. personal recovery). Barriers and facilitators varied; stigma often hindered offline discussion but encouraged anonymous online support.
CONCLUSIONS: Young people identify diverse, personally modifiable factors that guide self-harm recovery alone or with support. These factors are context- and person-dependent, underscoring the need for flexible, individualized approaches. Future research should also include low- and middle-income countries and include stratified analyses by sex and gender to capture a broader range of experiences and recovery pathways.