European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2026
Cultural acceptability and potential effectiveness of dignity therapy for patients with terminal cancer in Taiwan: A Quasi-Experimental study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chiu Tzu-Yun, Lai Wei-Shu, Fan Sheng-Yu, Fang Su-Ying, Liu Yu-Hsuan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study assessed the cultural acceptability and clinical effectiveness of dignity therapy (DT) among terminal cancer patients in Taiwan, addressing a significant gap in evidence regarding its applicability in East Asian contexts.
METHODS: A quasiexperimental, nonrandomized controlled design with integrated qualitative feedback analysis was employed. Twenty-four terminal cancer patients were assigned to either an intervention group (DT plus comfort care, n = 12) or a control group (comfort care only, n = 12). Dignity-related distress was measured using the Patient Dignity Inventory-Mandarin Version (PDI-MV) at baseline, postintervention, and at the two-week follow-up. Acceptability was assessed using the Dignity Therapy Patient and Family Feedback Questionnaires (DTPFQ/DTFFQ). Quantitative data were analyzed using t tests and repeated-measures ANOVA, while qualitative responses were analyzed thematically.
RESULTS: Participants in the intervention group experienced a significant reduction in dignity-related distress over time (F = 10.08, P < 0.001), whereas no significant change was observed in the control group (F = 0.70, P = 0.50). High acceptability was reported by participants who received DT (M = 4.21/5) and their family members (M = 4.28/5). Qualitative analysis revealed three overarching themes: (1) emotional catharsis and relief, (2) meaning-making and restoration, and (3) mutual understanding and reconciliation.
CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence supporting the feasibility, cultural relevance, and potential efficacy of DT in Taiwan. Integrating DT into culturally responsive palliative care may preserve patient dignity, reduce existential distress, and enhance meaningful family communication at the end of life in East Asian contexts.
METHODS: A quasiexperimental, nonrandomized controlled design with integrated qualitative feedback analysis was employed. Twenty-four terminal cancer patients were assigned to either an intervention group (DT plus comfort care, n = 12) or a control group (comfort care only, n = 12). Dignity-related distress was measured using the Patient Dignity Inventory-Mandarin Version (PDI-MV) at baseline, postintervention, and at the two-week follow-up. Acceptability was assessed using the Dignity Therapy Patient and Family Feedback Questionnaires (DTPFQ/DTFFQ). Quantitative data were analyzed using t tests and repeated-measures ANOVA, while qualitative responses were analyzed thematically.
RESULTS: Participants in the intervention group experienced a significant reduction in dignity-related distress over time (F = 10.08, P < 0.001), whereas no significant change was observed in the control group (F = 0.70, P = 0.50). High acceptability was reported by participants who received DT (M = 4.21/5) and their family members (M = 4.28/5). Qualitative analysis revealed three overarching themes: (1) emotional catharsis and relief, (2) meaning-making and restoration, and (3) mutual understanding and reconciliation.
CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence supporting the feasibility, cultural relevance, and potential efficacy of DT in Taiwan. Integrating DT into culturally responsive palliative care may preserve patient dignity, reduce existential distress, and enhance meaningful family communication at the end of life in East Asian contexts.