JMIR human factors · 2026
Exploring Video Consultations Across the Public and Private Sectors in Norway: Semistructured Interview Study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Skoge Mari, Aminoff Sofie Ragnhild, Ihler Henrik Myhre, Kværner Kari Jorunn, Støme Linn Nathalie, Romm Kristin Lie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Delivering therapy through video consultations can increase the reach and impact of mental health care services. However, adoption varies, and there is a lack of professional consensus about the usefulness of video consultations in therapy settings.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore mental health professionals' experiences with and attitudes toward video consultations across different clinical environments in the private and public health care sectors in Norway to inform the design of future digitalized services.
METHODS: In this qualitative study, we recruited leaders and clinicians from public hospitals and private clinics. We conducted semistructured interviews that mapped individual experiences and attitudes concerning video consultations, as well as contextual aspects concerning the participants' professional environments. We used reflexive thematic analysis with an inductive, essentialist, and experiential orientation to analyze the data.
RESULTS: A total of 24 mental health professionals (16 from public hospitals and 8 from private clinics) participated. Variations in their attitudes did not follow patterns reflecting the type of service or sector they worked in. Rather, attitudes seemed related to higher-level assumptions rooted in professional culture, societal values, and previous experiences. We generated six themes capturing and structuring the professional perspectives: (1) meta-perspectives on the digitalization of therapeutic rooms, (2) the "how" of service integration, (3) challenging therapist culture, (4) negotiating the limits of the digital therapy room, (5) creating clinical value from the digital format, and (6) adapting techniques and technology in digital therapy sessions.
CONCLUSIONS: To strengthen the adoption and impact of video consultations, we should direct attention toward higher-level societal and cultural aspects that shape attitudes and practices. We suggest incorporating digitalized therapy in education, facilitating personal experiences with video consultations, increasing the sharing of knowledge between clinical environments, and sparking innovation of both service models and technology.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore mental health professionals' experiences with and attitudes toward video consultations across different clinical environments in the private and public health care sectors in Norway to inform the design of future digitalized services.
METHODS: In this qualitative study, we recruited leaders and clinicians from public hospitals and private clinics. We conducted semistructured interviews that mapped individual experiences and attitudes concerning video consultations, as well as contextual aspects concerning the participants' professional environments. We used reflexive thematic analysis with an inductive, essentialist, and experiential orientation to analyze the data.
RESULTS: A total of 24 mental health professionals (16 from public hospitals and 8 from private clinics) participated. Variations in their attitudes did not follow patterns reflecting the type of service or sector they worked in. Rather, attitudes seemed related to higher-level assumptions rooted in professional culture, societal values, and previous experiences. We generated six themes capturing and structuring the professional perspectives: (1) meta-perspectives on the digitalization of therapeutic rooms, (2) the "how" of service integration, (3) challenging therapist culture, (4) negotiating the limits of the digital therapy room, (5) creating clinical value from the digital format, and (6) adapting techniques and technology in digital therapy sessions.
CONCLUSIONS: To strengthen the adoption and impact of video consultations, we should direct attention toward higher-level societal and cultural aspects that shape attitudes and practices. We suggest incorporating digitalized therapy in education, facilitating personal experiences with video consultations, increasing the sharing of knowledge between clinical environments, and sparking innovation of both service models and technology.