International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026
Comprehensive cognitive training improves anthropometric measures in people with excess weight: the TRAINEP randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Solier-López Lucía, González-González Raquel, Caracuel Alfonso, Verdejo-García Antonio, Puertas-González José A, Vilar-López Raquel
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a comprehensive cognitive intervention as an add-on to a standard behavioral weight-loss intervention (BWLI) in improving anthropometric measures in individuals with excess weight.
PARTICIPANTS: This randomized controlled trial included 148 participants (126 women; mean BMI = 31.62 kg/m²); 86.5% participants (n = 128) completed the study.
METHODS: Participants were randomized into three groups: (1) Cognitive group (received four cognitive trainings: inhibitory control, approach-avoidance bias modification, implementation intentions, and episodic future thinking); (2) Sham group (received placebo cognitive interventions); and (3) Control group (no cognitive intervention). All three groups received BWLI. Cognitive trainings were delivered through four consecutive 90-min online group sessions. BMI, weight, percentage of weight loss (%WL), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Mixed 3 (group) × 3 (time point) analysis were conducted to examine changes over time and between groups. Chi-squared test was used to explore group differences in reaching a clinically meaningful %WL.
RESULTS: Significant group-by-time effects interactions were found for BMI (p = 0.009), weight (p = 0.003), %WL (p = 0.004) and WHtR (p = 0.041). Post hoc analyses showed greater reductions in all anthropometric measures in the Cognitive group compared to the Control group at post-intervention and at both follow-ups. Further, only the Cognitive group showed significant improvements over time. At 6-month follow-up, effect sizes were moderate in the Cognitive group, small in the Sham group, and negligible to small in the Control group. A higher proportion of participants in the Cognitive group achieved a clinically meaningful %WL.
CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive cognitive training delivered as an add-on to BWLI improved anthropometric outcomes in individuals with excess weight, with sustained effects over 6 months.
PARTICIPANTS: This randomized controlled trial included 148 participants (126 women; mean BMI = 31.62 kg/m²); 86.5% participants (n = 128) completed the study.
METHODS: Participants were randomized into three groups: (1) Cognitive group (received four cognitive trainings: inhibitory control, approach-avoidance bias modification, implementation intentions, and episodic future thinking); (2) Sham group (received placebo cognitive interventions); and (3) Control group (no cognitive intervention). All three groups received BWLI. Cognitive trainings were delivered through four consecutive 90-min online group sessions. BMI, weight, percentage of weight loss (%WL), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Mixed 3 (group) × 3 (time point) analysis were conducted to examine changes over time and between groups. Chi-squared test was used to explore group differences in reaching a clinically meaningful %WL.
RESULTS: Significant group-by-time effects interactions were found for BMI (p = 0.009), weight (p = 0.003), %WL (p = 0.004) and WHtR (p = 0.041). Post hoc analyses showed greater reductions in all anthropometric measures in the Cognitive group compared to the Control group at post-intervention and at both follow-ups. Further, only the Cognitive group showed significant improvements over time. At 6-month follow-up, effect sizes were moderate in the Cognitive group, small in the Sham group, and negligible to small in the Control group. A higher proportion of participants in the Cognitive group achieved a clinically meaningful %WL.
CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive cognitive training delivered as an add-on to BWLI improved anthropometric outcomes in individuals with excess weight, with sustained effects over 6 months.