American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026
Response to the Letters by Chang and Bernstein Ratner.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Onslow Mark, Hearne Anna, Yu Kun, O'Brian Susan, Menzies Ross, Lowe Robyn
Аннотация
PURPOSE: In our original article, we draw attention to the lifetime quality-of-life impairment that can result from childhood stuttering-hence, the need for immediate intervention after onset. We drew on existing experimental outcomes that parent speech-rate reduction and increased interturn speaker latency may reduce stuttering. We developed a two-factor treatment protocol based on those variables in combination and showed its clinical viability, suggesting that it would be a suitable target for Phase I-IV clinical trials. Chang and Bernstein Ratner wrote letters to the editor on our article, to which we respond.
CONCLUSIONS: Our response to these letters to the editor covers the following issues raised by Chang and Bernstein Ratner: mechanisms of action for the proposed treatment, the evidence base for the treatment, plans to explore its treatment effects, and the need to verify its safety.
CONCLUSIONS: Our response to these letters to the editor covers the following issues raised by Chang and Bernstein Ratner: mechanisms of action for the proposed treatment, the evidence base for the treatment, plans to explore its treatment effects, and the need to verify its safety.