La Tunisie medicale · 2025
Tunisian Validation of the Dysarthria Clinical Evaluation Battery.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abdelhadi Rana, Messelmani Meriam, Chaker Emna, Souissi Sara, Soussi Sonia, Beldi Salah, Derbali Hajer, Mansour Malek, Zaouali Jamel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Dysarthria is defined as a motor speech disorder that can cause major communication problems. Meticulous assessment of this disorder is crucial for adequate therapeutic follow-up.
AIM: To Provide tunisian speech therapists with an almost complete tool for the evaluation of dysarthria.
METHODS: A single-center study adapted and validated the Dysarthria Clinical Evaluation Battery BECD 2019 in 135 dysarthric patients and 135 adult controls at different stages.
RESULTS: Comparison of scores between all samples showed significance, hence the sensitivity of the tool. Construct validity was carried out with the help of expert neurologists and speech therapists. Cronbach's alpha coefficient revealed a value of 0.7, indicating good internal consistency of the scale. The ROC curves of the different tests guided us in leaving the same threshold scores of the original battery.
CONCLUSION: Our study provided a dysarthria assessment tool, adapted to the Tunisian context, promoting a standardized clinical evaluation in order to harmonize communication amongclinicians.
AIM: To Provide tunisian speech therapists with an almost complete tool for the evaluation of dysarthria.
METHODS: A single-center study adapted and validated the Dysarthria Clinical Evaluation Battery BECD 2019 in 135 dysarthric patients and 135 adult controls at different stages.
RESULTS: Comparison of scores between all samples showed significance, hence the sensitivity of the tool. Construct validity was carried out with the help of expert neurologists and speech therapists. Cronbach's alpha coefficient revealed a value of 0.7, indicating good internal consistency of the scale. The ROC curves of the different tests guided us in leaving the same threshold scores of the original battery.
CONCLUSION: Our study provided a dysarthria assessment tool, adapted to the Tunisian context, promoting a standardized clinical evaluation in order to harmonize communication amongclinicians.