International journal of speech-language pathology · 2025
Phonological intervention in Greek-speaking preschoolers with speech sound disorders: Implementing phonological similarity and density.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Petinou Kakia
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The study examined speech gains in three bilectal Cypriot-Greek speaking children with speech sound disorders. The study is based on theoretical frameworks that are on par with word-level characteristics and is motivated by the sparsity of cross-language studies in speech sound disorder intervention.
METHOD: A multiple-baseline, single-participant design was implemented across three participants with speech sound disorders aged 3;2-4;0 years across baseline (pre-test), intervention, post-test, and follow-up phases. Intervention was administered twice a week for two months. Treatment stimuli were selected based on phonological density and phonological similarity grouped in word clusters. Outcomes were measured using a 49-word pictorial production probe list. Maintenance gains were examined with 20 non-treated stimuli during a follow-up session. Dependent variables included phonetic inventory size, proportion of consonants correct, and percentage of whole word matches. Intelligibility was measured via the Intelligibility in Context Scale.
RESULT: Phonological gains were observed across all measures with effect sizes ranging from 1.2 to 2.7.
CONCLUSION: Implementing phonologically dense stimuli may facilitate speech outcomes in children with speech sound disorders cross-linguistically.
METHOD: A multiple-baseline, single-participant design was implemented across three participants with speech sound disorders aged 3;2-4;0 years across baseline (pre-test), intervention, post-test, and follow-up phases. Intervention was administered twice a week for two months. Treatment stimuli were selected based on phonological density and phonological similarity grouped in word clusters. Outcomes were measured using a 49-word pictorial production probe list. Maintenance gains were examined with 20 non-treated stimuli during a follow-up session. Dependent variables included phonetic inventory size, proportion of consonants correct, and percentage of whole word matches. Intelligibility was measured via the Intelligibility in Context Scale.
RESULT: Phonological gains were observed across all measures with effect sizes ranging from 1.2 to 2.7.
CONCLUSION: Implementing phonologically dense stimuli may facilitate speech outcomes in children with speech sound disorders cross-linguistically.