Disability and rehabilitation · 2025
Functional communication disorders: a systematic review of interventions to improve outcomes in adults.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McKenzie Kirsty, Behn Nicholas, Rodgers Lucy, Hilari Katerina
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine what evidence there is for the effectiveness/efficacy of interventions to improve outcomes in adults with Functional Communication Disorders (FCDs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven electronic databases were searched via two platforms. The review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Population comprised adults with any specific communication diagnosis with a functional aetiology. We included studies of any type of behavioural intervention which targeted FCD, with any comparator. All outcomes related to communication were included. There were no restrictions on year or language of publication.
RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the review. Studies used different interventions and outcome measures thus meta-analysis was not performed. Six studies described interventions for functional voice disorders and one for functional stuttering. Interventions tended to include elements of patient education, standard voice or speech therapy, and a psychological support component. Study quality was generally poor.
CONCLUSION: There is a lack of high-quality research to guide clinicians on evidence-based interventions for the full range of FCDs. There were some common themes within the interventions offered, but the overall poor quality of studies makes it difficult to draw conclusions on the effectiveness and efficacy of these interventions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven electronic databases were searched via two platforms. The review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Population comprised adults with any specific communication diagnosis with a functional aetiology. We included studies of any type of behavioural intervention which targeted FCD, with any comparator. All outcomes related to communication were included. There were no restrictions on year or language of publication.
RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the review. Studies used different interventions and outcome measures thus meta-analysis was not performed. Six studies described interventions for functional voice disorders and one for functional stuttering. Interventions tended to include elements of patient education, standard voice or speech therapy, and a psychological support component. Study quality was generally poor.
CONCLUSION: There is a lack of high-quality research to guide clinicians on evidence-based interventions for the full range of FCDs. There were some common themes within the interventions offered, but the overall poor quality of studies makes it difficult to draw conclusions on the effectiveness and efficacy of these interventions.